अApnaFunda

MOTHERSON SUMI WIRING IND LTD (MSUMI)

Producer Manufacturing · Auto Parts: OEM · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.70 / 100
Profitability 62Growth 60Balance sheet 88
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.47 / 100
Price 52Earnings 28FII/DII 60

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitable

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹38.96 latest close · −5.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹35₹40Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹35₹40Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹38.96 month-end · −14.7% over 12 months

₹35₹40₹45Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹35₹40₹45Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹38.96 month-end · −5.1% over 3 years

₹30₹40₹50Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹30₹40₹50Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹38.96 month-end · +26.9% since Mar '22

₹30₹40₹50Mar '22Feb '23Jan '24Jan '25Dec '25Nov '26 ₹30₹40₹50Mar '22Jul '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹32.70 to ₹53.59 · 1-year volatility 31.3%

Was the rally earned?

-15%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 4 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 50.2x to 41.0x), which took 19 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −15%−15%Share priceNet profit growth: +5 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+5ProfitP/E change: −19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−19P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: −15%−15%Share price
Net profit growth+5 ptsNet profit rose about 5%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-19 ptsThe P/E fell from 50.2x to 41.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
-5%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 26 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 56.3x to 41.0x), which took 31 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +25 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+25 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: −5%−5%Share priceNet profit growth: +25 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+25ProfitP/E change: −31 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−31P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: −5%−5%Share price
Net profit growth+25 ptsNet profit rose about 30%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-31 ptsThe P/E fell from 56.3x to 41.0x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INT

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-40.3%not yet recovered
1-year volatility31.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.693-year daily, correlation 0.49
Volume spikes1last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−40.3% 0%−20%−40%2023202420252026−40.3%
Largest drawdowns

-40.3% (2024-06 peak to 2025-02 low, not yet recovered)

-29.1% (2022-09 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2023-09)

-19.2% (2022-04 peak to 2022-06 low, recovered 2022-07)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-02: 19.1x the 50-day median, price +10.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

41.0xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history22nd percentile
CheapestMedian 51.6xDearest

Usual range 38.8x to 62.7x since 2022-03.

Against Producer Manufacturing41.0x vs 29.6x
This company
41.0x
Sector median
29.6x

39% above the Producer Manufacturing median.

24.9x39.0x53.1x67.2xMar '22Mar '23Mar '24Mar '25Mar '26Nov '2624.9x39.0x53.1x67.2xMar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProducer Manufacturing median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Producer Manufacturing is valued

Where does it rank among Producer Manufacturing peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Producer Manufacturing peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE95thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin28th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth78th▲ 21 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth45th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓67th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓77thflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓31stflat vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum37th▼ 37 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Producer Manufacturing sector page Watch it move against Producer Manufacturing in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~21%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 41.0x, the price would imply about 20.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Producer Manufacturing The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹38.96
P/E
41.0x
ROCE
39.0%
Market Cap
₹25867 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹12391 cr
P/S
2.1x
P/B
12.0x
ROE
29.2%
Operating Margin
8.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
61.7%
12M Momentum
-14.7%

52-week range

₹32.70₹53.59
30% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
31.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.74

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
31.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.03x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 near a threshold
Other income reliance1%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 1.0%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.03xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.03x (cash from operations ₹1,917 cr, net profit ₹1,869 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+19 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 19 days (60 vs 41). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+31 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +31 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs trimmed 2.2 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 7.2 lakh to 8.7 lakh (+21%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters61.8%61.7%0.0 pts
FIIs11.1%8.9%-2.2 pts
DIIs17.6%17.9%+0.3 pts
Public and others9.4%11.5%+2.1 pts

Number of shareholders

8.7 lakhshareholders+21% since Sep '23
7.2L8.0L8.8L9.5L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 7.2 lakh
Dec '23: 7.8 lakh
Mar '24: 8.9 lakh
Jun '24: 8.9 lakh
Sep '24: 9.2 lakh
Dec '24: 9.4 lakh
Mar '25: 9.5 lakh
Jun '25: 9.3 lakh
Sep '25: 9.2 lakh
Dec '25: 8.8 lakh
Mar '26: 8.6 lakh
Jun '26: 8.7 lakh
7.2L8.0L8.8L9.5L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 7.2 lakh
Dec '23: 7.8 lakh
Mar '24: 8.9 lakh
Jun '24: 8.9 lakh
Sep '24: 9.2 lakh
Dec '24: 9.4 lakh
Mar '25: 9.5 lakh
Jun '25: 9.3 lakh
Sep '25: 9.2 lakh
Dec '25: 8.8 lakh
Mar '26: 8.6 lakh
Jun '26: 8.7 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−5.3%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like MOTHERSON SUMI WIRING IND LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −24% to +18% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−4.3%, 80% range −10.5% to +1.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
LUXIND · Sep 2021: −50.4% vs market
ARE&M · Feb 2021: −47.0% vs market
BALAMINES · Nov 2022: −42.1% vs market
BSOFT · Jan 2022: −36.1% vs market
MPHASIS · Apr 2022: −36.0% vs market
SAFARI · Apr 2025: −33.9% vs market
CROMPTON · May 2022: −30.4% vs market
PSPPROJECT · May 2020: −29.3% vs market
RSYSTEMS · Feb 2024: −29.0% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · May 2023: −26.4% vs market
RATNAMANI · Jan 2024: −26.0% vs market
IONEXCHANG · Apr 2025: −25.6% vs market
SFL · Jan 2022: −24.5% vs market
EMAMILTD · Dec 2021: −21.0% vs market
CENTURYPLY · May 2023: −18.8% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Jun 2021: −18.4% vs market
VIPIND · Mar 2020: −18.0% vs market
ORIENTELEC · Sep 2021: −18.0% vs market
LTTS · Oct 2023: −15.2% vs market
VGUARD · Aug 2021: −12.9% vs market
JAMNAAUTO · Apr 2023: −9.9% vs market
PRINCEPIPE · Apr 2022: −9.8% vs market
APLAPOLLO · May 2023: −7.7% vs market
GALAXYSURF · Nov 2021: −7.7% vs market
GARFIBRES · Dec 2021: −5.5% vs market
COROMANDEL · May 2023: −5.1% vs market
VOLTAS · Jun 2025: −3.0% vs market
PRAJIND · Oct 2023: −0.9% vs market
BLUESTARCO · Jun 2025: −0.6% vs market
TIINDIA · Oct 2023: +2.1% vs market
KEI · Sep 2024: +2.4% vs market
ECLERX · Jul 2022: +3.4% vs market
BHARATRAS · Mar 2021: +4.8% vs market
TECHM · Apr 2021: +6.7% vs market
KAJARIACER · Jun 2022: +10.5% vs market
ABBOTINDIA · May 2022: +12.3% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Nov 2021: +13.7% vs market
ENDURANCE · Apr 2020: +19.5% vs market
SUMICHEM · Dec 2021: +22.0% vs market
ESCORTS · Apr 2022: +22.8% vs market
SUNDRMFAST · Apr 2020: +31.6% vs market
KPRMILL · Nov 2022: +35.7% vs market
NH · May 2024: +39.5% vs market
COFORGE · Mar 2024: +42.2% vs market
MAHLOG · Mar 2020: +42.3% vs market
HAVELLS · Jan 2020: +45.6% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Oct 2023: +49.9% vs market
PERSISTENT · May 2024: +57.3% vs market
SONATSOFTW · Mar 2022: +58.8% vs market
POLYCAB · Nov 2020: +70.5% vs market
Similar setups −5.3%All companies −1.0%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−5.3%
All companies' median
−1.0%
Beat the market
42% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 30 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DEEPAKNTR
Process Industries
May 2023 27x44% +4%−12% −26%
SONATSOFTW
Technology Services
Mar 2022 32x39% +45%−23% +59%
POLYCAB
Producer Manufacturing
Nov 2020 19x29% +4%−18% +71%
CENTURYPLY
Producer Manufacturing
May 2023 40x30% −3%−20% −19%
TIINDIA
Non-Energy Minerals
Oct 2023 64x32% +15%−15% +2%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
BLUESTARCO
Producer Manufacturing
Jun 2025 57x26% 0%−30% −1%
COFORGE
Technology Services
Mar 2024 48x31% +44%−19% +42%
VIPIND
Consumer Durables
Mar 2020 23x38% −50%−53% −18%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and debt/equity. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to MOTHERSON SUMI WIRING IND LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Consumer Durables
60%similar
operating marginrevenue growth
Retail Trade
56%similar
operating marginEPS growth
Commercial Services
55%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
Industrial Services
55%similar
revenue growthpromoter holding
MARICOMARICO
Consumer Non-Durables
54%similar
revenueROCE
Producer Manufacturing
72%similar
operating marginP/E
Producer Manufacturing
66%similar
revenuerevenue growth
Producer Manufacturing
64%similar
P/Epromoter holding

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Sep '22

  1. NovPriceVolume reached 19.1x its 50-day median on 2026-11-02; price +10.4% that day.
  2. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (38.7x).
  3. AugPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Producer Manufacturing on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 27.7x its 50-day median on 2026-06-25; price +9.1% that day.
  7. MarValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (38.8x).
  8. JanPriceVolume reached 6.2x its 50-day median on 2026-01-05; price +4.4% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecPriceVolume reached 14.0x its 50-day median on 2025-12-19; price +6.1% that day.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 7.7x its 50-day median on 2025-08-19; price +6.2% that day.
  3. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 55% to 26% of profit.
  6. FebPriceFell 40% from the Jun 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  7. JanPriceVolume reached 8.9x its 50-day median on 2025-01-07; price -0.5% that day.
  8. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹8,327 cr.
  9. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (52.3x).
  10. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Producer Manufacturing on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. JunPriceVolume reached 8.1x its 50-day median on 2024-06-18; price +6.6% that day.
  12. AprSharesShare count is up 39.9% over 12 months.
  13. FebPriceVolume reached 10.1x its 50-day median on 2024-02-01; price +7.5% that day.
  14. SepPriceRegained the 2022-09 peak, 6 months after the low.
  15. JulPriceVolume reached 8.3x its 50-day median on 2023-07-25; price +6.8% that day.
  16. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹7,068 cr.
  17. MayPriceVolume reached 9.1x its 50-day median on 2023-05-23; price +1.9% that day.
  18. MarPriceFell 29% from the Sep 2022 peak to the Mar 2023 low.
  19. MarDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.25x.
  20. MarSharesShare count is up 200.0% over 12 months.
  21. JanPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2023-01-13; price -0.9% that day.
  22. SepPriceVolume reached 9.6x its 50-day median on 2022-09-16; price -4.7% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history57 months · 2022-03 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1141.0x₹12391 cr29.2%39.0%0.1x
2026-1037.0x₹12391 cr29.0%39.0%0.1x
2026-0935.9x₹12391 cr29.0%39.0%0.1x
2026-0838.7x₹11478 cr28.9%39.0%0.1x
2026-0742.7x₹11478 cr28.9%39.0%0.1x
2026-0642.2x₹11478 cr28.9%39.0%0.1x
2026-0541.0x₹10653 cr36.6%43.0%0.2x
2026-0442.7x₹10653 cr36.6%43.0%0.2x
2026-0338.8x₹10653 cr36.6%43.0%0.2x
2026-0246.5x₹10066 cr36.1%43.0%0.2x
2026-0146.4x₹10066 cr36.1%43.0%0.2x
2025-1252.2x₹10066 cr36.1%43.0%0.2x
2025-1150.2x₹9630 cr35.3%43.0%0.2x
2025-1051.9x₹9630 cr35.3%43.0%0.2x
2025-0950.2x₹9630 cr35.3%43.0%0.2x
2025-0845.7x₹9321 cr35.7%43.0%0.2x
2025-0740.8x₹9321 cr35.7%43.0%0.2x
2025-0643.7x₹9321 cr35.7%43.0%0.2x
2025-0540.6x₹9044 cr37.7%48.0%0.2x
2025-0439.1x₹9044 cr37.7%48.0%0.2x
2025-0336.6x₹9044 cr37.7%48.0%0.2x
2025-0231.6x₹8859 cr39.4%48.0%0.2x
2025-0137.8x₹8859 cr39.4%48.0%0.2x
2024-1239.2x₹8859 cr39.4%48.0%0.2x
2024-1142.7x₹8642 cr39.6%48.0%0.2x
2024-1041.9x₹8642 cr39.6%48.0%0.2x
2024-0947.5x₹8642 cr39.6%48.0%0.2x
2024-0848.9x₹8327 cr38.0%48.0%0.2x
2024-0751.3x₹8327 cr38.0%48.0%0.2x
2024-0652.3x₹8327 cr38.0%48.0%0.2x
2024-0561.8x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2024-0463.1x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2024-0360.4x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2024-0264.1x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2024-0159.4x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-1256.4x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-1156.3x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-1054.8x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-0958.9x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-0856.7x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-0753.5x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-0652.7x₹7068 cr36.6%44.0%0.3x
2023-0562.2x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2023-0457.8x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2023-0351.9x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2023-0253.2x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2023-0155.3x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-1262.7x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-1166.1x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-1067.2x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-0967.2x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-0862.6x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-0759.4x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-0654.1x₹5635 cr36.9%88.0%0.3x
2022-05—₹3938 cr——960.0x
2022-04—₹3938 cr——960.0x
2022-03—₹3938 cr——960.0x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback