अApnaFunda

RADHIKA JEWELTECH LIMITED (RADHIKAJWE)

Retail Trade · Specialty Stores · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.82 / 100
Profitability 86Growth 76Balance sheet 84
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.38 / 100
Price 37Earnings 39

Passes these screensQuality CompounderValue PickDebt-light & profitableConsistent compounders

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹61.33 latest close · +8.6% over the last 90 sessions

₹60₹80Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹60₹80Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹61.33 month-end · −23.5% over 12 months

₹50₹60₹70₹80Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹50₹60₹70₹80Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹61.33 month-end · +44.5% over 3 years

₹50₹100₹150Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹61.33 month-end · +96.6% since Jul '22

₹50₹100₹150Jul '22May '23Apr '24Feb '25Jan '26Nov '26 ₹50₹100₹150Jul '22Sep '24Nov '26

52-week range ₹50.01 to ₹97.50 · 1-year volatility 51.1%

Was the rally earned?

-24%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 21 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 15.1x to 9.1x), which took 44 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −44 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−44 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: −23%−23%Share priceNet profit growth: +21 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+21ProfitP/E change: −44 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−44P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: −23%−23%Share price
Net profit growth+21 ptsNet profit rose about 27%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-44 ptsThe P/E fell from 15.1x to 9.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+45%share price, 3 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 119 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 16.8x to 9.1x), which took 74 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +118 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+118 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +45%+45%Share priceNet profit growth: +118 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+118ProfitP/E change: −74 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−74P/EShare count change: +1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+1SharesShare price: +45%+45%Share price
Net profit growth+118 ptsNet profit rose about 166%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-74 ptsThe P/E fell from 16.8x to 9.1x, which lowers the price.
Share count change+1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with AVENUE SUPERMARTS LTD DMART

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility51.1%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.913-year daily, correlation 0.32
Volume spikes19last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−64.2% 0%−20%−40%−60%2023202420252026−64.2%
Largest drawdowns

-66.4% (2024-10 peak to 2026-03 low, not yet recovered)

-46.8% (2023-01 peak to 2023-03 low, recovered 2024-01)

-28.9% (2022-08 peak to 2022-11 low, recovered 2023-01)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-09: 7.5x the 50-day median, price -0.9% that day

2026-09-08: 10.6x the 50-day median, price -6.7% that day

2026-09-07: 45.4x the 50-day median, price +13.4% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

9.1xP/E todayNear its historic low
Against its own history9th percentile
CheapestMedian 15.5xDearest

Usual range 9.8x to 24.8x since 2022-07.

Against Retail Trade9.1x vs 22.4x
This company
9.1x
Sector median
22.4x

59% below the Retail Trade median.

7.6x26.7x45.8x65.0xJul '22Jun '23May '24Apr '25Mar '26Nov '267.6x26.7x45.8x65.0xJul '22Jan '24Jul '25Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianRetail Trade median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Retail Trade is valued

Where does it rank among Retail Trade peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Retail Trade peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE87th▼ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin84th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth44th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth60th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓71st▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓11th▼ 3 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓89th▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum40th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Retail Trade sector page Watch it move against Retail Trade in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~12%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 15.0x, the price would imply about 12.0%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Retail Trade The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹61.33
P/E
9.1x
ROCE
25.0%
Market Cap
₹726 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹693 cr
P/S
1.0x
P/B
1.8x
ROE
20.1%
Operating Margin
20.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
57.7%
12M Momentum
-23.5%

52-week range

₹50.01₹97.50
24% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
51.1%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.27

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
37.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.12x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range2 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance1%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 0.9%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.5%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.12xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.12x (cash from operations ₹-22 cr, net profit ₹185 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow1 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 1. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+1 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 1 days (1 vs 0). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress0% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 0% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+9 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by +9 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, promoters trimmed 6.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 15,722 to 69,622 (+343%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters63.7%57.7%-6.0 pts
FIIs0.1%0.0%0.0 pts
DIIs0.0%0.0%0.0 pts
Public and others36.2%42.3%+6.1 pts

Number of shareholders

69,622shareholders+343% since Sep '23
16k37k58k78k Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 15,722
Dec '23: 26,275
Mar '24: 42,652
Jun '24: 43,140
Sep '24: 64,954
Dec '24: 77,431
Mar '25: 78,426
Jun '25: 77,544
Sep '25: 77,551
Dec '25: 74,162
Mar '26: 71,429
Jun '26: 69,622
16k37k58k78k Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 15,722
Dec '23: 26,275
Mar '24: 42,652
Jun '24: 43,140
Sep '24: 64,954
Dec '24: 77,431
Mar '25: 78,426
Jun '25: 77,544
Sep '25: 77,551
Dec '25: 74,162
Mar '26: 71,429
Jun '26: 69,622

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+1.2%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like RADHIKA JEWELTECH LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −28% to +53% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+2.4%, 80% range −4.3% to +10.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
BALAXI · May 2024: −60.0% vs market
NOVAAGRI · Mar 2025: −55.6% vs market
PPL · May 2025: −50.0% vs market
KELLTONTEC · Mar 2022: −44.8% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Jul 2023: −43.7% vs market
GTPL · Apr 2022: −43.6% vs market
GANESHBE · Jul 2024: −40.5% vs market
MOL · Oct 2022: −39.4% vs market
RUCHIRA · Jan 2020: −36.4% vs market
LINC · Aug 2025: −32.4% vs market
GNA · Jan 2024: −32.2% vs market
EXPLEOSOL · Aug 2023: −31.1% vs market
TVTODAY · Oct 2022: −29.5% vs market
TNPETRO · May 2022: −24.1% vs market
PANAMAPET · Apr 2023: −22.9% vs market
BODALCHEM · Feb 2020: −19.7% vs market
SPIC · Mar 2023: −16.2% vs market
ASAHISONG · Sep 2021: −12.0% vs market
INDRAMEDCO · Mar 2021: −12.0% vs market
KSL · Nov 2021: −6.7% vs market
DBCORP · Feb 2025: −6.2% vs market
FROG · Aug 2025: −2.8% vs market
ORBTEXP · Mar 2025: −1.6% vs market
SHREEPUSHK · Jan 2020: −1.2% vs market
TALBROAUTO · Mar 2025: +0.9% vs market
CYBERTECH · May 2024: +1.5% vs market
DATAMATICS · May 2024: +4.8% vs market
DLINKINDIA · Mar 2021: +7.5% vs market
MOREPENLAB · Mar 2023: +9.7% vs market
SIYSIL · Nov 2023: +9.9% vs market
ORIENTCER · Mar 2021: +15.2% vs market
EVERESTIND · May 2020: +16.3% vs market
CIGNITITEC · Jan 2022: +20.1% vs market
MALLCOM · Feb 2024: +30.2% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Jan 2022: +32.8% vs market
ALLDIGI · Nov 2020: +32.9% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · Aug 2021: +53.3% vs market
BLISSGVS · Jul 2024: +53.5% vs market
AKSHARCHEM · Oct 2020: +54.8% vs market
FIEMIND · Feb 2021: +56.3% vs market
ANDHRSUGAR · Dec 2020: +57.7% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Mar 2020: +81.0% vs market
SAKSOFT · Jun 2020: +85.4% vs market
ACCENTMIC · Mar 2025: +102.2% vs market
IGPL · Apr 2020: +111.0% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Sep 2022: +133.1% vs market
KOTHARIPET · Nov 2020: +134.2% vs market
IMFA · Apr 2025: +139.6% vs market
TIIL · Oct 2022: +144.6% vs market
MANALIPETC · Feb 2020: +192.7% vs market
Similar setups +1.2%All companies −1.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 7 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+1.2%
All companies' median
−1.2%
Beat the market
52% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 34 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
IGPL
Process Industries
Apr 2020 4x29% −53%−56% +111%
SAKSOFT
Technology Services
Jun 2020 5x25% −42%−44% +85%
DLINKINDIA
Electronic Technology
Mar 2021 10x20% +73%−20% +8%
LUMAXTECH
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2020 5x20% −64%−64% +81%
BANCOINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
Sep 2022 9x24% −7%−31% +133%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
DBCORP
Consumer Services
Feb 2025 8x25% −31%−49% −6%
BODALCHEM
Process Industries
Feb 2020 6x24% −33%−46% −20%
PPL
Producer Manufacturing
May 2025 10x29% +3%−38% −50%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and drawdown from 12-month high. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to RADHIKA JEWELTECH LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Energy Minerals
70%similar
revenue growthP/E
Technology Services
68%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Industrial Services
68%similar
promoter holdingP/E
Process Industries
65%similar
P/Emarket cap
Process Industries
64%similar
EPS growthmarket cap
Retail Trade
53%similar
promoter holdingvolatility
Retail Trade
45%similar
revenueP/E
Retail Trade
22%similar
P/Emarket cap

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '23

  1. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  2. AugValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (10.6x).
  3. JulPriceVolume reached 94.2x its 50-day median on 2026-07-09; price +13.1% that day.
  4. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-05-08; price +4.6% that day.
  6. MarPriceFell 66% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  7. JanPriceVolume reached 71.6x its 50-day median on 2026-01-07; price +12.3% that day.
  8. DecPromoterPromoter holding fell 6.0 pts to 57.7%.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (12.5x).
  2. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  3. NovPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2025-11-04; price +3.4% that day.
  4. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 72.6x its 50-day median on 2025-07-17; price +14.4% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  7. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 5% to 0% of profit.
  8. AprPriceVolume reached 10.9x its 50-day median on 2025-04-04; price -4.9% that day.
  9. MarPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  10. JanPriceVolume reached 14.2x its 50-day median on 2025-01-21; price +5.0% that day.
  11. DecResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹555 cr.
  12. SepValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (36.2x).
  13. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  14. AugPriceRegained the 2024-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  15. AugPriceVolume reached 37.2x its 50-day median on 2024-08-20; price +8.1% that day.
  16. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹545 cr.
  17. JunPriceFell 25% from the Feb 2024 peak to the Jun 2024 low.
  18. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Retail Trade on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  19. JunPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2024-06-28; price +8.1% that day.
  20. JanPriceRegained the 2023-01 peak, 10 months after the low.
  21. JanPriceVolume reached 21.0x its 50-day median on 2024-01-30; price +7.4% that day.
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 31.1x its 50-day median on 2023-10-19; price +19.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history53 months · 2022-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-119.1x₹693 cr20.1%25.0%0.1x
2026-108.6x₹693 cr20.1%25.0%0.1x
2026-0910.4x₹693 cr20.1%25.0%0.1x
2026-0810.6x₹639 cr18.8%25.0%0.1x
2026-0711.3x₹639 cr18.8%25.0%0.1x
2026-068.7x₹639 cr18.8%25.0%0.1x
2026-058.7x₹603 cr24.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-049.7x₹603 cr24.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-037.6x₹603 cr24.1%26.0%0.1x
2026-0211.1x₹595 cr21.7%26.0%0.1x
2026-0111.2x₹595 cr21.7%26.0%0.1x
2025-1212.5x₹595 cr21.7%26.0%0.1x
2025-1115.1x₹593 cr19.5%26.0%0.1x
2025-1015.7x₹593 cr19.5%26.0%0.1x
2025-0916.7x₹593 cr19.5%26.0%0.1x
2025-0819.0x₹588 cr18.0%26.0%0.1x
2025-0720.5x₹588 cr18.0%26.0%0.1x
2025-0617.4x₹588 cr18.0%26.0%0.1x
2025-0517.4x₹585 cr21.9%25.0%0.2x
2025-0418.3x₹585 cr21.9%25.0%0.2x
2025-0316.1x₹585 cr21.9%25.0%0.2x
2025-0220.5x₹555 cr19.2%25.0%0.2x
2025-0124.4x₹555 cr19.2%25.0%0.2x
2024-1223.3x₹555 cr19.2%25.0%0.2x
2024-1124.5x₹531 cr18.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-1029.0x₹531 cr18.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0936.2x₹531 cr18.5%25.0%0.2x
2024-0824.6x₹545 cr18.9%25.0%0.2x
2024-0717.2x₹545 cr18.9%25.0%0.2x
2024-0614.7x₹545 cr18.9%25.0%0.2x
2024-0524.5x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2024-0425.1x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2024-0325.7x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2024-0226.2x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2024-0124.9x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-1217.7x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-1116.8x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-1017.0x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-0914.7x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-0813.6x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-0714.3x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-0615.5x₹313 cr13.9%18.0%0.2x
2023-0515.3x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2023-0414.0x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2023-0312.9x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2023-0214.2x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2023-0118.8x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-1213.3x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-1115.1x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-1013.5x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-0914.8x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-0817.0x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x
2022-0713.6x₹233 cr14.4%19.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback