अApnaFunda

UPL LIMITED (UPL)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Agricultural · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.37 / 100
Profitability 51Growth 26Balance sheet 35
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.70 / 100
Price 54Earnings 62FII/DII 95

Passes these screensCash Rich

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹541.5 latest close · −10.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹500₹550₹600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹500₹550₹600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹541.5 month-end · −28.6% over 12 months

₹500₹600₹700₹800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹500₹600₹700₹800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹541.5 month-end · −1.1% over 3 years

₹600₹800Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹600₹800Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹541.5 month-end · +7.7% since Jan '19

₹400₹600₹800Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹400₹600₹800Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹476.45 to ₹812.20 · 1-year volatility 35.4%

Was the rally earned?

-29%share price, 1 yearLower P/E held it back

Earnings helped, the multiple did not.

  • Per-share earnings added 45 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 53.7x to 22.6x), which took 73 points back.
  • The share count rose 17%.
Net profit growth: +58 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+58 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−73 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−13 ptsShare count changeShare price: −29%−29%Share priceNet profit growth: +58 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+58ProfitP/E change: −73 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−73P/EShare count change: −13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−13SharesShare price: −29%−29%Share price
Net profit growth+58 ptsNet profit rose about 98%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-73 ptsThe P/E fell from 53.7x to 22.6x, which lowers the price.
Share count change-13 ptsShare count rose 17%, which lowers the price.
-1%share price, 3 yearsRoughly flat
  • The share price was roughly flat over 3 years (-1%).
  • The share count fell 7%.
Net profit growth: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−64 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+55 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+7 ptsShare count changeShare price: −1%−1%Share priceNet profit growth: −64 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−64ProfitP/E change: +55 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+55P/EShare count change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+7SharesShare price: −1%−1%Share price
Net profit growth-64 ptsNet profit fell about 47%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+55 ptsThe P/E rose from 12.9x to 22.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+7 ptsShare count fell 7%, which lifts the price.
-17%share price, 5 yearsEarnings-driven

Mostly earnings.

  • Per-share earnings took off 30 points, while the multiple moved less (P/E 19.6x to 22.6x).
  • The share count fell 7%.
Net profit growth: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−37 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+13 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+7 ptsShare count changeShare price: −17%−17%Share priceNet profit growth: −37 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−37ProfitP/E change: +13 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+13P/EShare count change: +7 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+7SharesShare price: −17%−17%Share price
Net profit growth-37 ptsNet profit fell about 34%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+13 ptsThe P/E rose from 19.6x to 22.6x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+7 ptsShare count fell 7%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAV

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-63.5%recovered 2021-05
1-year volatility35.4%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.063-year daily, correlation 0.58
Volume spikes0last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−57.3% 0%−20%−40%−60%2020202220242026−57.3%
Largest drawdowns

-63.5% (2019-07 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-05)

-47.1% (2021-06 peak to 2024-03 low, not yet recovered)

-15.9% (2019-06 peak to 2019-06 low, recovered 2019-07)

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

22.6xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history51st percentile
CheapestMedian 22.6xDearest

Usual range 13.7x to 42.1x since 2019-01.

Against Process Industries22.6x vs 18.1x
This company
22.6x
Sector median
18.1x

25% above the Process Industries median.

6.8x469.7x932.7x1395.6xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '266.8x469.7x932.7x1395.6xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE45th▲ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin58th▼ 20 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth62nd▲ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth83rd
  • Debt/equity ↓30th▲ 9 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓39th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓39th▲ 23 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum21st▼ 71 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~17%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 26.2x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 17.2%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−15.2%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+32.4 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank42ndmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-15%5%25% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -15%5%25% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x18.5%19.6%20.7%
15x16.1%17.2%18.2%
20x13.0%14.0%15.0%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 17.2%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2020Price implied 19%/yr; EPS has since grown 4%/yr (7.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2021Price implied 20%/yr; EPS has since grown −1%/yr (6.0 yrs)
  • Jan 2022Price implied 21%/yr; EPS has since grown −11%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹541.50
P/E
22.6x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹45729 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹52804 cr
P/S
0.9x
P/B
1.3x
ROE
5.8%
Operating Margin
13.0%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
33.5%
12M Momentum
-28.6%

52-week range

₹476.45₹812.20
19% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
35.4%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.13

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
2.0x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
5.00x
Share count, 1Y
+6.3%

Are profits backed by cash?

6 of 7checks within range1 near a threshold
Other income reliance25%Near threshold

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 24.6%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate22%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 22.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion17.49xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 17.49x (cash from operations ₹20,327 cr, net profit ₹1,162 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+2 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 2 days (126 vs 124). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress7% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 7% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-27 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -27 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 3 years, FIIs added 8.8 pts; DIIs trimmed 2.9 pts; promoters added 1.0 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 3.8 lakh to 2.7 lakh (-29%) between Sep 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '23Jun '26Change
Promoters32.5%33.5%+1.0 pts
FIIs33.6%42.4%+8.8 pts
DIIs17.3%14.3%-2.9 pts
Public and others16.6%9.8%-6.9 pts

Number of shareholders

2.7 lakhshareholders-29% since Sep '23
2.7L3.4L4.1L4.8L Sep '23Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3.8 lakh
Dec '23: 4.1 lakh
Mar '24: 4.8 lakh
Jun '24: 4.4 lakh
Sep '24: 3.8 lakh
Dec '24: 3.6 lakh
Mar '25: 3.2 lakh
Jun '25: 3.1 lakh
Sep '25: 2.8 lakh
Dec '25: 2.7 lakh
Mar '26: 2.8 lakh
Jun '26: 2.7 lakh
2.7L3.4L4.1L4.8L Sep '23Sep '24Sep '25Jun '26
Sep '23: 3.8 lakh
Dec '23: 4.1 lakh
Mar '24: 4.8 lakh
Jun '24: 4.4 lakh
Sep '24: 3.8 lakh
Dec '24: 3.6 lakh
Mar '25: 3.2 lakh
Jun '25: 3.1 lakh
Sep '25: 2.8 lakh
Dec '25: 2.7 lakh
Mar '26: 2.8 lakh
Jun '26: 2.7 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

+4.6%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like UPL LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −12% to +52% vs the market, against −5% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (+9.4%, 80% range −4.0% to +26.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
DBL · Sep 2021: −61.3% vs market
TVSSRICHAK · Jan 2024: −34.9% vs market
SOMANYCERA · Feb 2024: −29.4% vs market
TRIDENT · Dec 2024: −24.3% vs market
BPCL · Sep 2020: −24.3% vs market
EMIL · Oct 2024: −23.0% vs market
VARROC · Feb 2020: −21.2% vs market
GODREJAGRO · Jul 2022: −16.8% vs market
RKFORGE · Jun 2025: −16.4% vs market
BIRLACORPN · Jan 2025: −14.7% vs market
INDOCO · Oct 2024: −12.3% vs market
HINDALCO · May 2022: −12.0% vs market
PCBL · Sep 2025: −11.9% vs market
GRINFRA · Jul 2022: −11.7% vs market
GESHIP · Jan 2021: −11.4% vs market
SIS · Sep 2022: −11.0% vs market
TRIVENI · Aug 2025: −9.9% vs market
KIRLOSIND · Jun 2025: −8.8% vs market
TATACHEM · Sep 2024: −8.6% vs market
TATASTEEL · May 2022: −8.2% vs market
GODREJIND · Jul 2022: −6.5% vs market
SUPRAJIT · Aug 2024: −6.4% vs market
APOLLOTYRE · May 2024: −3.4% vs market
PRSMJOHNSN · May 2022: +2.7% vs market
JKLAKSHMI · May 2024: +2.7% vs market
PNCINFRA · Aug 2022: +6.5% vs market
EPL · Dec 2023: +9.3% vs market
INDIACEM · May 2022: +9.6% vs market
DALBHARAT · Dec 2024: +14.2% vs market
ASTERDM · Jan 2022: +15.9% vs market
KPIL · Apr 2025: +20.6% vs market
WELSPUNLIV · Jan 2020: +29.0% vs market
AARTIIND · Aug 2025: +29.5% vs market
RAMCOCEM · Aug 2024: +36.6% vs market
GRASIM · Jun 2020: +48.0% vs market
KEC · Aug 2022: +50.8% vs market
SAIL · Apr 2025: +52.2% vs market
CEATLTD · May 2024: +52.5% vs market
M&M · Mar 2020: +55.2% vs market
TORNTPOWER · Jan 2023: +66.2% vs market
TATAPOWER · Jun 2020: +66.6% vs market
TVSMOTOR · Dec 2021: +67.0% vs market
JSWENERGY · May 2020: +68.8% vs market
MOTHERSON · Aug 2025: +70.9% vs market
INDUSTOWER · Aug 2023: +77.7% vs market
ARVIND · Aug 2025: +83.7% vs market
KALYANKJIL · Jun 2022: +104.4% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Apr 2025: +113.2% vs market
JSWSTEEL · Jun 2020: +121.0% vs market
SOBHA · May 2023: +154.2% vs market
Similar setups +4.6%All companies −4.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 5 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
+4.6%
All companies' median
−4.8%
Beat the market
54% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
TATAPOWER
Utilities
Jun 2020 12x8% −35%−39% +67%
BIRLACORPN
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2025 29x9% −24%−34% −15%
INDUSTOWER
Communications
Aug 2023 22x11% −12%−14% +78%
APOLLOTYRE
Consumer Durables
May 2024 28x10% +19%−16% −3%
MOTHERSON
Producer Manufacturing
Aug 2025 26x14% −29%−35% +71%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
AARTIIND
Process Industries
Aug 2025 41x6% −40%−41% +30%
JSWENERGY
Utilities
May 2020 9x9% −45%−49% +69%
TRIDENT
Process Industries
Dec 2024 53x10% −8%−33% −24%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and ROCE. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to UPL LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

TATA STEELTATASTEEL
Non-Energy Minerals
67%similar
revenue growthpromoter holding
TORRENT POWERTORNTPOWER
Utilities
63%similar
debt/equityrevenue
Non-Energy Minerals
62%similar
debt/equityoperating margin
DALMIA BHARATDALBHARAT
Non-Energy Minerals
59%similar
market caprevenue
Energy Minerals
58%similar
ROCEP/E
Process Industries
66%similar
operating marginpromoter holding
ARVINDARVIND
Process Industries
62%similar
promoter holdingrevenue
JK PAPERJKPAPER
Process Industries
62%similar
volatilityP/E

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since May '23

  1. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the top quartile).
  2. JulSharesShare count is up 6.3% over 12 months.
  3. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 53% to 26% of profit.
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 7.9x its 50-day median on 2026-06-29; price -3.7% that day.
  5. MarResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  6. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 9.9x its 50-day median on 2026-02-23; price -14.3% that day.
  8. AugPriceVolume reached 7.6x its 50-day median on 2025-08-04; price +7.0% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunPeer rankMoved into the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  2. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.86x).
  3. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 53% of profit).
  4. JunSharesShare count is up 6.0% over 12 months.
  5. AprResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  6. MarResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  7. MarValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (1325.5x).
  8. MarPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  9. FebPriceVolume reached 7.2x its 50-day median on 2025-02-03; price +4.3% that day.
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2024-11-21; price +1.6% that day.
  11. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  12. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  13. JunDebtDebt / equity rose above 1.0x (1.20x).
  14. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 21% to -6% of profit.
  15. MayPriceVolume reached 8.7x its 50-day median on 2024-05-13; price +6.4% that day.
  16. MarPriceFell 47% from the Jun 2021 peak to the Mar 2024 low.
  17. FebPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2024-02-05; price -11.2% that day.
  18. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹53,576 cr.
  19. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  20. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.89x).
  21. MayValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (15.6x).
  22. MayPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2023-05-09; price -2.9% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history60 months · 2021-12 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1122.6x₹52804 cr5.8%10.0%0.7x
2026-1021.4x₹52804 cr5.8%10.0%0.7x
2026-0922.5x₹52804 cr5.8%10.0%0.7x
2026-0824.7x₹51839 cr5.6%10.0%0.7x
2026-0726.5x₹51839 cr5.6%10.0%0.7x
2026-0625.1x₹51839 cr5.6%10.0%0.7x
2026-0531.0x₹49077 cr6.0%8.0%0.9x
2026-0430.8x₹49077 cr6.0%8.0%0.9x
2026-0327.3x₹49077 cr6.0%8.0%0.9x
2026-0224.6x₹47715 cr7.1%8.0%0.9x
2026-0127.1x₹47715 cr7.1%8.0%0.9x
2025-1230.7x₹47715 cr7.1%8.0%0.9x
2025-1153.7x₹46786 cr3.5%8.0%0.9x
2025-1051.0x₹46786 cr3.5%8.0%0.9x
2025-0946.4x₹46786 cr3.5%8.0%0.9x
2025-0867.4x₹46637 cr2.4%8.0%0.9x
2025-0766.3x₹46637 cr2.4%8.0%0.9x
2025-0662.3x₹46637 cr2.4%8.0%0.9x
2025-051308.1x₹45142 cr0.1%3.0%1.2x
2025-041395.6x₹45142 cr0.1%3.0%1.2x
2025-031325.5x₹45142 cr0.1%3.0%1.2x
2025-02—₹44122 cr-9.8%3.0%1.2x
2025-01—₹44122 cr-9.8%3.0%1.2x
2024-12—₹44122 cr-9.8%3.0%1.2x
2024-11—₹43202 cr-8.8%3.0%1.2x
2024-10—₹43202 cr-8.8%3.0%1.2x
2024-09—₹43202 cr-8.8%3.0%1.2x
2024-08—₹43098 cr-6.6%3.0%1.2x
2024-07—₹43098 cr-6.6%3.0%1.2x
2024-06—₹43098 cr-6.6%3.0%1.2x
2024-0511.5x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2024-0411.5x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2024-0310.3x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2024-0210.7x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2024-0112.2x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-1213.3x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-1112.9x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-1012.3x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-0914.0x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-0813.4x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-0714.2x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-0615.6x₹53576 cr14.3%14.0%0.9x
2023-0515.6x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-0416.8x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-0316.3x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-0215.8x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2023-0117.2x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-1216.3x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-1118.0x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-1016.6x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-0915.3x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-0817.5x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-0716.9x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-0614.4x₹46240 cr15.7%14.0%1.1x
2022-0522.4x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x
2022-0423.6x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x
2022-0322.1x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x
2022-0219.1x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x
2022-0122.3x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x
2021-1221.5x₹38694 cr14.6%13.0%1.2x

Older months are in the live observatory.

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback