अApnaFunda

ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTIL LTD (ABDL)

Consumer Non-Durables · Beverages: Alcoholic · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.43 / 100
Profitability 58Balance sheet 29
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.65 / 100
Price 87Earnings 32FII/DII 76

Passes these screensPrice ahead of businessLittle growth priced inNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹719.1 latest close · +9.8% over the last 90 sessions

₹600₹650₹700₹750Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹600₹650₹700₹750Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹719.1 month-end · +10.0% over 12 months

₹400₹500₹600₹700Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹400₹500₹600₹700Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹719.1 month-end · +133.3% since Jul '24

₹400₹600Jul '24Jan '25Jun '25Dec '25May '26Nov '26 ₹400₹600Jul '24Sep '25Nov '26

52-week range ₹382.10 to ₹766.90 · 1-year volatility 40.5%

Was the rally earned?

+10%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 76.2x to 91.0x); per-share earnings took off 9 points.
  • The share count fell 5%.
Net profit growth: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−14 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19 ptsP/E changeShare count change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+6 ptsShare count changeShare price: +10%+10%Share priceNet profit growth: −14 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−14ProfitP/E change: +19 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+19P/EShare count change: +6 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.+6SharesShare price: +10%+10%Share price
Net profit growth-14 ptsNet profit fell about 13%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+19 ptsThe P/E rose from 76.2x to 91.0x, which lifts the price.
Share count change+6 ptsShare count fell 5%, which lifts the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with UNITED SPIRITS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-43.8%recovered 2026-07
1-year volatility40.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.073-year daily, correlation 0.36
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%20252026−41.9% 0%−20%−40%20252026−41.9%
Largest drawdowns

-43.8% (2025-11 peak to 2026-03 low, recovered 2026-07)

-30.2% (2025-01 peak to 2025-05 low, recovered 2025-06)

-16.9% (2024-07 peak to 2024-08 low, recovered 2024-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-28: 5.7x the 50-day median, price +1.2% that day

2026-09-25: 12.7x the 50-day median, price +0.4% that day

2026-09-24: 20.6x the 50-day median, price +8.5% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

91.0xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history69th percentile
CheapestMedian 76.2xDearest

Usual range 55.3x to 581.4x since 2024-07.

Against Consumer Non-Durables91.0x vs 26.8x
This company
91.0x
Sector median
26.8x

240% above the Consumer Non-Durables median.

24.1x1727.5x3430.9x5134.3xJul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '2624.1x1727.5x3430.9x5134.3xJul '24May '25Mar '26Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianConsumer Non-Durables median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Consumer Non-Durables is valued

Where does it rank among Consumer Non-Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Non-Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE67th▼ 11 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin49th▼ 4 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth53rd▼ 7 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth25th▼ 74 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓24thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓44th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓9th▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum78th▼ 18 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Non-Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Non-Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~47%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 227.6x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 47.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered113.0%/yrEPS, last 7 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−13.0 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank733rdmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

0%57%114% Jul 2024Nov 2026 0%57%114% Jul 2024Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x49.0%50.3%51.7%
15x45.7%47.0%48.3%
20x41.6%42.8%44.1%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 47.0%/yr

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Consumer Non-Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹719.10
P/E
91.0x
ROCE
18.0%
Market Cap
₹20121 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹3979 cr
P/S
5.1x
P/B
12.1x
ROE
13.3%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Debt / Equity
0.7x
Promoter Holding
80.9%
12M Momentum
10.0%

52-week range

₹382.10₹766.90
88% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
40.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.10

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
-0.31x
low
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 7checks within range1 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance6%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 6.1%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate28%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 28.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion-0.31xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: -0.31x (cash from operations ₹-130 cr, net profit ₹417 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow4 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 4. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+10 daysWithin range

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 10 days (168 vs 159). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress12% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 12% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days+31 days / 2 yrsNear threshold

Days payable changed by +31 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 1.6 pts; FIIs trimmed 0.6 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 3.6 lakh to 1.1 lakh (-69%) between Jun 2024 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupJun '24Jun '26Change
Promoters80.9%80.9%0.0 pts
FIIs3.8%3.2%-0.6 pts
DIIs3.5%5.1%+1.6 pts
Public and others11.7%10.8%-1.0 pts

Number of shareholders

1.1 lakhshareholders-69% since Jun '24
1.1L1.9L2.8L3.6L Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 3.6 lakh
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.1 lakh
Jun '25: 1.1 lakh
Sep '25: 1.1 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh
1.1L1.9L2.8L3.6L Jun '24Mar '25Dec '25Jun '26
Jun '24: 3.6 lakh
Sep '24: 1.2 lakh
Dec '24: 1.1 lakh
Mar '25: 1.1 lakh
Jun '25: 1.1 lakh
Sep '25: 1.1 lakh
Dec '25: 1.3 lakh
Mar '26: 1.2 lakh
Jun '26: 1.1 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−1.1%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTIL LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +23% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.3%, 80% range −10.3% to +6.6%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
SOLARA · May 2021: −78.1% vs market
ASIANTILES · Sep 2020: −61.9% vs market
ANURAS · Apr 2023: −50.1% vs market
TASTYBITE · Jun 2023: −46.6% vs market
VRLLOG · Mar 2023: −41.4% vs market
ASTEC · Jun 2022: −39.3% vs market
RKFORGE · Mar 2025: −38.0% vs market
ASTERDM · Feb 2020: −35.2% vs market
JUBLFOOD · Jul 2021: −32.3% vs market
HNDFDS · Nov 2022: −31.0% vs market
MAHLOG · Mar 2021: −29.6% vs market
NELCO · Aug 2022: −25.8% vs market
UNITDSPR · Jan 2020: −21.5% vs market
CRAFTSMAN · May 2023: −21.0% vs market
RADICO · Jul 2023: −19.5% vs market
ARTEMISMED · Nov 2024: −16.4% vs market
NEOGEN · Nov 2021: −16.0% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Feb 2025: −13.7% vs market
MEDANTA · Nov 2023: −13.1% vs market
GREENLAM · Mar 2022: −13.1% vs market
HLEGLAS · Jul 2025: −9.4% vs market
ASAHIINDIA · Jan 2022: −8.1% vs market
JKCEMENT · Mar 2023: −6.2% vs market
HATSUN · Oct 2025: −4.9% vs market
AARTIIND · Jan 2020: −1.2% vs market
SUNDRMFAST · Feb 2021: −1.0% vs market
BBTC · Apr 2023: +1.7% vs market
TORNTPOWER · Aug 2022: +3.1% vs market
RAINBOW · Dec 2023: +6.9% vs market
ASTRAMICRO · Nov 2023: +7.2% vs market
VMART · Dec 2020: +8.8% vs market
NH · Nov 2020: +9.4% vs market
TEGA · Sep 2025: +10.8% vs market
TORNTPHARM · Jun 2022: +10.9% vs market
UNOMINDA · Nov 2021: +11.1% vs market
MINDACORP · Sep 2025: +21.0% vs market
HIKAL · Apr 2021: +21.3% vs market
PUNJABCHEM · Feb 2021: +24.1% vs market
APOLLOHOSP · Jan 2020: +29.6% vs market
ASALCBR · Jul 2024: +31.8% vs market
VIJAYA · Dec 2023: +33.0% vs market
BLUEDART · Mar 2020: +41.0% vs market
SOLARINDS · Mar 2022: +42.8% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Feb 2021: +51.2% vs market
DYNAMATECH · Oct 2025: +54.9% vs market
VBL · Aug 2022: +58.9% vs market
KPITTECH · Dec 2022: +69.3% vs market
GVT&D · May 2025: +124.7% vs market
DIXON · Dec 2023: +132.3% vs market
FLUOROCHEM · Apr 2021: +183.8% vs market
Similar setups −1.1%All companies −0.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 3 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−1.1%
All companies' median
−0.8%
Beat the market
48% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 33 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ASAHIINDIA
Consumer Durables
Jan 2022 102x11% +111%−5% −8%
AARTIIND
Process Industries
Jan 2020 35x18% +21%0% −1%
UNOMINDA
Producer Manufacturing
Nov 2021 119x11% +135%−5% +11%
BLUEDART
Transportation
Mar 2020 58x17% −39%−39% +41%
UNITDSPR
Consumer Non-Durables
Jan 2020 64x20% +15%−8% −22%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
VBL
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2022 97x17% +83%−1% +59%
CENTURYPLY
Producer Manufacturing
Feb 2025 74x18% +2%−21% −14%
ASTEC
Process Industries
Jun 2022 45x22% +36%−7% −39%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high and debt/equity. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTIL LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Utilities
70%similar
P/Evolatility
Producer Manufacturing
66%similar
promoter holdingROCE
ASK AUTOMOTIVEASKAUTOLTD
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
operating marginrevenue
Process Industries
60%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
Technology Services
57%similar
market capdebt/equity
Consumer Non-Durables
54%similar
market capoperating margin
Consumer Non-Durables
36%similar
operating marginrevenue
Consumer Non-Durables
36%similar
debt/equityoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

20 events since Dec '24

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. SepPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).
  3. SepPriceVolume reached 20.6x its 50-day median on 2026-09-24; price +8.5% that day.
  4. JulPriceRegained the 2025-11 peak, 4 months after the low.
  5. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  6. JunPriceVolume reached 6.4x its 50-day median on 2026-06-12; price +5.9% that day.
  7. MarPriceFell 44% from the Nov 2025 peak to the Mar 2026 low.
  8. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.59x.
Show 12 earlier events
  1. OctPriceVolume reached 5.4x its 50-day median on 2025-10-29; price +6.0% that day.
  2. JulDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.59x.
  3. JulSharesShare count is up 14.3% over 12 months.
  4. JunPriceRegained the 2025-01 peak, 1 month after the low.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  6. JunDebtDebt / equity fell below 1.0x (0.59x).
  7. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 52% of profit).
  8. MayPriceFell 30% from the Jan 2025 peak to the May 2025 low.
  9. AprPriceVolume reached 14.5x its 50-day median on 2025-04-15; price -3.1% that day.
  10. MarPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Non-Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  11. MarPriceVolume reached 5.9x its 50-day median on 2025-03-28; price -4.0% that day.
  12. DecPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2024-12-17; price +4.3% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history29 months · 2024-07 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1191.0x₹3979 cr13.3%18.0%0.7x
2026-1088.4x₹3979 cr13.3%18.0%0.7x
2026-0991.0x₹3979 cr13.3%18.0%0.7x
2026-0875.8x₹3923 cr14.0%18.0%0.7x
2026-0775.9x₹3923 cr14.0%18.0%0.7x
2026-0681.9x₹3923 cr14.0%18.0%0.7x
2026-0558.7x₹3837 cr17.9%21.0%0.6x
2026-0455.9x₹3837 cr17.9%21.0%0.6x
2026-0342.5x₹3837 cr17.9%21.0%0.6x
2026-0251.9x₹3808 cr17.5%21.0%0.6x
2026-0153.0x₹3808 cr17.5%21.0%0.6x
2025-1266.8x₹3808 cr17.5%21.0%0.6x
2025-1176.2x₹3686 cr16.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-1077.2x₹3686 cr16.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-0959.2x₹3686 cr16.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-0872.6x₹3521 cr13.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-0774.0x₹3521 cr13.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-0661.9x₹3521 cr13.4%21.0%0.6x
2025-0598.7x₹3368 cr29.6%16.0%2.1x
2025-0475.9x₹3368 cr29.6%16.0%2.1x
2025-0375.6x₹3368 cr29.6%16.0%2.1x
2025-02171.3x₹3289 cr13.8%16.0%2.1x
2025-01212.7x₹3289 cr13.8%16.0%2.1x
2024-12236.0x₹3289 cr13.8%16.0%2.1x
2024-11580.6x₹3272 cr4.2%16.0%2.1x
2024-10559.7x₹3272 cr4.2%16.0%2.1x
2024-09584.5x₹3272 cr4.2%16.0%2.1x
2024-085134.3x₹3328 cr0.4%16.0%2.1x
2024-074402.9x₹3328 cr0.4%16.0%2.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback