अApnaFunda

GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMICALS LTD (FLUOROCHEM)

Process Industries · Chemicals: Specialty · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.50 / 100
Profitability 69Growth 21Balance sheet 60
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.67 / 100
Price 70Earnings 43FII/DII 88

Passes these screensNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹4,574.5 latest close · +15.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹4,000₹4,500Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹4,000₹4,500Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹4,574.5 month-end · +33.6% over 12 months

₹3,000₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹3,000₹3,500₹4,000₹4,500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹4,574.5 month-end · +60.4% over 3 years

₹3,000₹4,000Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹3,000₹4,000Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹4,574.5 month-end · +591.6% since Oct '19

₹0₹2,000₹4,000Oct '19Mar '21Aug '22Jan '24Jun '25Nov '26 ₹0₹2,000₹4,000Oct '19May '23Nov '26

52-week range ₹2916.60 to ₹4958.90 · 1-year volatility 31.3%

Was the rally earned?

+34%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 60.6x to 83.1x); per-share earnings took off 3 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+37 ptsP/E changeShare price: +34%+34%Share priceNet profit growth: −3 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−3ProfitP/E change: +37 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+37P/EShare price: +34%+34%Share price
Net profit growth-3 ptsNet profit fell about 2%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+37 ptsThe P/E rose from 60.6x to 83.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+60%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 23.6x to 83.1x); per-share earnings took off 101 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: −100 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−100 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +161 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+161 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1 ptsShare count changeShare price: +60%+60%Share priceNet profit growth: −100 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−100ProfitP/E change: +161 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+161P/EShare count change: −1 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−1SharesShare price: +60%+60%Share price
Net profit growth-100 ptsNet profit fell about 54%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+161 ptsThe P/E rose from 23.6x to 83.1x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-1 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with LINDE INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-66.9%recovered 2021-04
1-year volatility31.3%annualised
Beta vs sector index0.853-year daily, correlation 0.43
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%−60%2020202120222023202420252026−61.7% 0%−20%−40%−60%202220242026−61.7%
Largest drawdowns

-66.9% (2019-10 peak to 2020-03 low, recovered 2021-04)

-38.3% (2024-10 peak to 2026-02 low, not yet recovered)

-36.3% (2022-10 peak to 2023-01 low, recovered 2024-09)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-08-13: 10.6x the 50-day median, price +3.3% that day

2026-08-12: 8.8x the 50-day median, price +3.4% that day

2026-07-21: 7.1x the 50-day median, price +6.7% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

83.0xP/E todayNear its historic high
Against its own history82nd percentile
CheapestMedian 48.2xDearest

Usual range 25.1x to 94.8x since 2019-10.

Against Process Industries83.0x vs 18.1x
This company
83.0x
Sector median
18.1x

359% above the Process Industries median.

6.8x50.7x94.5x138.4xOct '19Mar '21Aug '22Jan '24Jun '25Nov '266.8x50.7x94.5x138.4xOct '19Mar '22Aug '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianProcess Industries median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Process Industries is valued

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE45thflat vs a year ago
  • Op. margin93rdflat vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth54th▼ 13 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth33rd▼ 54 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓51st▼ 8 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓3rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓7th▼ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum84th▲ 19 pts vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~30%annual earnings growth implied by the priceAbove delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 68.2x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 30.0%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered−1.2%/yrEPS, last 9 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap+31.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank47thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-1%17%35% Jun 2020Nov 2026 -1%17%35% Jun 2020Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x31.7%32.9%34.1%
15x28.9%30.0%31.2%
20x25.3%26.4%27.5%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 30.0%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2021Price implied 8%/yr; EPS has since grown 20%/yr (6.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹4574.50
P/E
83.1x
ROCE
10.0%
Market Cap
₹50253 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹5303 cr
P/S
9.5x
P/B
6.4x
ROE
7.7%
Operating Margin
27.0%
Debt / Equity
0.3x
Promoter Holding
61.4%
12M Momentum
33.6%

52-week range

₹2916.60₹4958.90
81% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
31.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.84

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
7.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.37x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

4 of 7checks within range3 near a threshold
Other income reliance1%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 1.3%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate28%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 28.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.37xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.37x (cash from operations ₹2,132 cr, net profit ₹1,555 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow2 of 5 yrsNear threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 2. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history+22 daysNear threshold

Debtor days are above the median of the previous three fiscal years by 22 days (94 vs 72). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress39% of fixed assetsNear threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 39% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-15 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -15 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, DIIs added 4.7 pts; promoters trimmed 2.4 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 71,178 to 61,120 (-14%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters63.8%61.4%-2.4 pts
FIIs4.6%4.4%-0.2 pts
DIIs8.6%13.3%+4.7 pts
Public and others23.0%20.9%-2.2 pts

Number of shareholders

61,120shareholders-14% since Dec '23
61k64k68k71k Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 71,178
Mar '24: 67,328
Jun '24: 68,283
Sep '24: 66,592
Dec '24: 68,544
Mar '25: 66,906
Jun '25: 68,420
Sep '25: 66,493
Dec '25: 64,664
Mar '26: 62,703
Jun '26: 61,120
61k64k68k71k Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 71,178
Mar '24: 67,328
Jun '24: 68,283
Sep '24: 66,592
Dec '24: 68,544
Mar '25: 66,906
Jun '25: 68,420
Sep '25: 66,493
Dec '25: 64,664
Mar '26: 62,703
Jun '26: 61,120

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−9.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMICALS LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −21% to +6% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −8.5%, 80% range −16.7% to −4.6%), but the matches cluster in only 5 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
ANURAS · May 2023: −54.4% vs market
SYMPHONY · Feb 2023: −49.3% vs market
STARCEMENT · Aug 2025: −39.8% vs market
SYNGENE · May 2023: −35.4% vs market
MTARTECH · May 2023: −34.0% vs market
TORNTPHARM · Sep 2020: −32.7% vs market
SHREECEM · Jun 2020: −27.0% vs market
ZYDUSLIFE · Oct 2020: −24.6% vs market
ALKEM · May 2020: −24.1% vs market
DALBHARAT · Mar 2021: −23.8% vs market
BATAINDIA · Jul 2022: −22.8% vs market
GODREJCP · May 2020: −22.4% vs market
MRF · Mar 2020: −21.3% vs market
METROBRAND · Feb 2025: −19.9% vs market
LUPIN · Apr 2020: −19.8% vs market
RADICO · Jul 2023: −19.5% vs market
SRF · Jul 2025: −18.1% vs market
UNOMINDA · Dec 2021: −17.9% vs market
MEDANTA · Jan 2024: −16.3% vs market
ABB · Mar 2020: −16.2% vs market
UNITDSPR · Feb 2022: −15.5% vs market
DLF · Sep 2021: −14.8% vs market
RAINBOW · Aug 2025: −12.6% vs market
GODREJPROP · Mar 2024: −10.6% vs market
LODHA · Jun 2024: −9.8% vs market
INDHOTEL · Nov 2024: −9.7% vs market
RAMCOCEM · Feb 2020: −7.6% vs market
TITAN · Feb 2022: −5.9% vs market
SUNPHARMA · Mar 2020: −5.6% vs market
AETHER · Feb 2025: −5.1% vs market
OBEROIRLTY · Sep 2021: −5.1% vs market
CIPLA · Apr 2020: −3.3% vs market
AARTIIND · May 2020: −1.3% vs market
METROPOLIS · Aug 2025: −1.2% vs market
IPCALAB · Apr 2024: +2.9% vs market
TATACONSUM · May 2020: +3.9% vs market
ASTERDM · Oct 2025: +6.2% vs market
THERMAX · Aug 2022: +6.2% vs market
VOLTAS · Feb 2020: +10.2% vs market
ELGIEQUIP · Mar 2021: +18.6% vs market
TATACHEM · Sep 2021: +19.8% vs market
KIMS · Feb 2025: +21.1% vs market
DRREDDY · Jan 2020: +24.1% vs market
MAXHEALTH · Mar 2023: +25.1% vs market
FORTIS · Feb 2025: +30.3% vs market
PHOENIXLTD · Feb 2023: +33.6% vs market
JKCEMENT · May 2020: +40.1% vs market
NAVINFLUOR · Jul 2025: +42.3% vs market
VBL · Jul 2022: +58.9% vs market
LAURUSLABS · Jul 2025: +97.2% vs market
Similar setups −9.8%All companies −1.3%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−9.8%
All companies' median
−1.3%
Beat the market
32% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 27 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
NAVINFLUOR
Process Industries
Jul 2025 87x11% +33%−3% +42%
FORTIS
Health Services
Feb 2025 71x10% +50%−17% +30%
RADICO
Consumer Non-Durables
Jul 2023 88x12% +54%0% −20%
INDHOTEL
Consumer Services
Nov 2024 88x15% +88%−1% −10%
SRF
Process Industries
Jul 2025 72x12% +15%−8% −18%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUNPHARMA
Health Technology
Mar 2020 32x10% −26%−26% −6%
ASTERDM
Health Services
Oct 2025 108x11% +53%−6% +6%
SYNGENE
Commercial Services
May 2023 73x13% +27%0% −35%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, P/E and 12-month momentum. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 5 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMICALS LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

JINDAL STEELJINDALSTEL
Non-Energy Minerals
67%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
BATA INDIABATAINDIA
Consumer Non-Durables
62%similar
EPS growthvolatility
DALMIA BHARATDALBHARAT
Non-Energy Minerals
61%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Consumer Durables
60%similar
revenueROCE
Consumer Durables
53%similar
market capdebt/equity
SRFSRF
Process Industries
57%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Process Industries
56%similar
volatilityROCE
Process Industries
54%similar
EPS growthvolatility

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Jun '22

  1. SepResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 10.6x its 50-day median on 2026-08-13; price +3.3% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  4. AprPriceVolume reached 9.0x its 50-day median on 2026-04-30; price +7.2% that day.
  5. FebPriceFell 38% from the Oct 2024 peak to the Feb 2026 low.
  6. FebPriceVolume reached 7.8x its 50-day median on 2026-02-03; price +7.5% that day.
  7. SepPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the 2nd quartile).
  8. SepPriceVolume reached 37.7x its 50-day median on 2025-09-17; price -0.1% that day.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
  2. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2024-10-10; price +6.8% that day.
  4. SepPriceRegained the 2022-10 peak, 20 months after the low.
  5. SepPriceVolume reached 32.8x its 50-day median on 2024-09-06; price +8.1% that day.
  6. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  7. JunValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (80.6x).
  8. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  9. JunPriceVolume reached 27.0x its 50-day median on 2024-06-21; price -0.5% that day.
  10. NovPriceVolume reached 6.0x its 50-day median on 2023-11-07; price -0.9% that day.
  11. OctValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (22.9x).
  12. JunResultsRevenue (TTM) reached a new high of ₹5,685 cr.
  13. JunValuationP/E fell below the 10th percentile of its own history to date (24.2x).
  14. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 2nd quartile).
  15. JunDividendDividend payout cut from 6% to 3% of profit.
  16. JanPriceFell 36% from the Oct 2022 peak to the Jan 2023 low.
  17. DecPriceVolume reached 35.3x its 50-day median on 2022-12-05; price -5.8% that day.
  18. JulPriceRegained the 2022-02 peak, 2 months after the low.
  19. JulPriceVolume reached 9.8x its 50-day median on 2022-07-27; price -3.4% that day.
  20. JunResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  21. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Process Industries on ROCE (from the 3rd quartile).
  22. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 6% of profit).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history86 months · 2019-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1183.1x₹5303 cr7.7%10.0%0.3x
2026-1077.1x₹5303 cr7.6%10.0%0.3x
2026-0980.0x₹5303 cr7.6%10.0%0.3x
2026-0891.1x₹4996 cr7.2%10.0%0.3x
2026-0784.7x₹4996 cr7.2%10.0%0.3x
2026-0676.9x₹4996 cr7.2%10.0%0.3x
2026-0561.0x₹4852 cr9.0%10.0%0.3x
2026-0460.5x₹4852 cr9.0%10.0%0.3x
2026-0350.9x₹4852 cr9.0%10.0%0.3x
2026-0256.4x₹4864 cr9.3%10.0%0.3x
2026-0149.5x₹4864 cr9.3%10.0%0.3x
2025-1259.4x₹4864 cr9.3%10.0%0.3x
2025-1160.6x₹4842 cr8.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-1066.3x₹4842 cr8.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0965.7x₹4842 cr8.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0868.7x₹4737 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0772.3x₹4737 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0673.0x₹4737 cr7.5%10.0%0.3x
2025-0585.6x₹4645 cr7.7%10.0%0.4x
2025-0493.8x₹4645 cr7.7%10.0%0.4x
2025-0396.9x₹4645 cr7.7%10.0%0.4x
2025-0296.1x₹4489 cr6.9%10.0%0.4x
2025-0195.9x₹4489 cr6.9%10.0%0.4x
2024-12111.6x₹4489 cr6.9%10.0%0.4x
2024-11127.2x₹4248 cr5.8%10.0%0.4x
2024-10138.4x₹4248 cr5.8%10.0%0.4x
2024-09137.3x₹4248 cr5.8%10.0%0.4x
2024-0880.2x₹4281 cr7.3%10.0%0.4x
2024-0785.5x₹4281 cr7.3%10.0%0.4x
2024-0680.6x₹4281 cr7.3%10.0%0.4x
2024-0525.1x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2024-0430.0x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2024-0325.6x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2024-0230.6x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2024-0130.5x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-1230.6x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-1123.6x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-1022.9x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-0925.2x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-0825.2x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-0722.5x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-0624.2x₹5685 cr24.0%30.0%0.3x
2023-0547.6x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2023-0447.2x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2023-0342.1x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2023-0243.9x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2023-0138.8x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-1243.4x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-1148.8x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-1052.9x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-0955.1x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-0846.7x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-0746.7x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-0638.7x₹3954 cr18.2%20.0%0.4x
2022-05—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2022-04—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2022-03—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2022-02—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2022-01—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-12—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-11—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-10—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-09—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-08—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-07—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-06—₹2650 cr-6.4%11.0%0.5x
2021-0546.3x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2021-0444.7x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2021-0332.2x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2021-0232.3x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2021-0131.8x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-1231.8x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-1132.1x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-1026.8x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-0927.4x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-0828.6x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-0722.5x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-0620.0x₹2606 cr5.1%9.0%0.5x
2020-05—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2020-04—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2020-03—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2020-02—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2020-01—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2019-12—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2019-11—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x
2019-10—₹2729 cr35.5%11.0%0.3x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback