अApnaFunda

LG ELECTRONICS INDIA LTD (LGEINDIA)

Consumer Durables · Electronics/Appliances · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.88 / 100
Profitability 75Balance sheet 100
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.57 / 100
Price 87Earnings 26

Passes these screensQuality CompounderDebt-light & profitablePrice ahead of businessNear 52-week high

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,793.8 latest close · +15.9% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,500₹1,600₹1,700₹1,800Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,500₹1,600₹1,700₹1,800Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,793.8 month-end · +8.1% over 12 months

₹1,600₹1,800Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹1,600₹1,800Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,793.8 month-end · +7.8% since Oct '25

₹1,600₹1,800Oct '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹1,600₹1,800Oct '25May '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹1304.10 to ₹1836.00 · 1-year volatility 29.3%

Was the rally earned?

+8%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 51.1x to 66.7x); per-share earnings took off 20 points.
  • The share count rose 8%.
Net profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8 ptsShare count changeShare price: +8%+8%Share priceNet profit growth: −11 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).−11ProfitP/E change: +28 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+28P/EShare count change: −8 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−8SharesShare price: +8%+8%Share price
Net profit growth-11 ptsNet profit fell about 10%, which lowers the price.
P/E change+28 ptsThe P/E rose from 51.1x to 66.7x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-8 ptsShare count rose 8%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-22.0%recovered 2026-08
1-year volatility29.3%annualised
Volume spikes4last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−10%−20%2026−22.0% 0%−10%−20%2026−22.0%
Largest drawdowns

-22.0% (2025-10 peak to 2026-04 low, recovered 2026-08)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-11-05: 7x the 50-day median, price +5.1% that day

2026-10-05: 7.1x the 50-day median, price +2.9% that day

2026-08-17: 5.6x the 50-day median, price -3.6% that day

Where does it rank among Consumer Durables peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Consumer Durables peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE90th▼ 10 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin60th▲ 6 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth23rd
  • EPS growth11th
  • Debt/equity ↓79thflat vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓73rdflat vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓10th▼ 19 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum72nd

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Consumer Durables sector page Watch it move against Consumer Durables in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~26%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 66.7x, the price would imply about 26.4%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Fewer than six years of annual earnings are available, which is too little to measure delivered growth.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Consumer Durables The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1793.80
P/E
66.7x
ROCE
32.0%
Market Cap
₹1.22L cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹25575 cr
P/S
4.8x
P/B
15.9x
ROE
23.8%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Debt / Equity
0.1x
Promoter Holding
85.0%
12M Momentum
8.1%

52-week range

₹1304.10₹1836.00
92% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
29.3%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.59

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
61.6x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.93x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

5 of 5checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance14%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 14.2%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate26%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 26.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.93xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.93x (cash from operations ₹5,040 cr, net profit ₹5,399 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress29% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 29% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

What happened next to similar setups

−16.4%typical 12-month return vs the marketBelow the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like LG ELECTRONICS INDIA LTD today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −27% to 0% vs the market, against −1% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The analogs' median sat below that base rate (gap −15.2%, 80% range −20.7% to −11.5%), but the matches cluster in only 6 distinct 12-month windows.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%
ARE&M · Nov 2020: −53.7% vs market
HEROMOTOCO · Sep 2020: −45.2% vs market
ASTRAL · Apr 2024: −37.5% vs market
PGHL · May 2023: −37.4% vs market
DEEPAKNTR · Jul 2024: −36.8% vs market
SIEMENS · Apr 2024: −35.8% vs market
CENTURYPLY · Mar 2022: −31.5% vs market
HINDUNILVR · Jan 2023: −30.8% vs market
3MINDIA · Dec 2023: −30.7% vs market
DABUR · Jan 2023: −30.4% vs market
RELAXO · Oct 2021: −30.0% vs market
AIAENG · Aug 2020: −29.5% vs market
SUMICHEM · Sep 2022: −27.6% vs market
BRITANNIA · Mar 2020: −25.0% vs market
CRISIL · May 2023: −24.7% vs market
GRINDWELL · Jul 2023: −24.3% vs market
EICHERMOT · Oct 2022: −22.0% vs market
PAGEIND · May 2022: −21.4% vs market
KAJARIACER · Jan 2022: −20.6% vs market
KEI · Mar 2024: −19.3% vs market
GALAXYSURF · Apr 2021: −19.3% vs market
ABBOTINDIA · Mar 2023: −17.3% vs market
AJANTPHARM · Aug 2024: −17.2% vs market
CARBORUNIV · Jan 2023: −16.9% vs market
BAJAJ-AUTO · Mar 2024: −16.9% vs market
ENDURANCE · Sep 2020: −16.0% vs market
POLYCAB · May 2024: −15.4% vs market
SUPREMEIND · Jan 2021: −14.6% vs market
BERGEPAINT · Jun 2025: −14.1% vs market
GODREJCP · Mar 2023: −13.0% vs market
LTTS · Jul 2021: −11.9% vs market
EMAMILTD · May 2024: −11.1% vs market
SFL · Feb 2020: −8.4% vs market
SCHAEFFLER · Sep 2025: −7.9% vs market
UNITDSPR · Aug 2024: −3.6% vs market
BOSCHLTD · Jul 2025: −3.4% vs market
CUMMINSIND · Mar 2024: −2.0% vs market
CROMPTON · Sep 2020: +0.1% vs market
MARICO · Apr 2025: +2.3% vs market
VOLTAS · Nov 2020: +5.5% vs market
SUNPHARMA · Jul 2022: +5.7% vs market
COFORGE · Nov 2024: +5.8% vs market
HAVELLS · Oct 2020: +8.7% vs market
ATUL · Jan 2020: +8.9% vs market
PERSISTENT · Aug 2024: +11.3% vs market
KIMS · Sep 2022: +12.5% vs market
JBCHEPHARM · Jan 2023: +18.1% vs market
GLAXO · May 2024: +19.8% vs market
HAL · Mar 2024: +21.2% vs market
BEL · Jul 2022: +24.2% vs market
Similar setups −16.4%All companies −1.2%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months

Similar setups' median
−16.4%
All companies' median
−1.2%
Beat the market
26% vs 49%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 32 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
SUPREMEIND
Producer Manufacturing
Jan 2021 49x26% +30%0% −15%
ABBOTINDIA
Health Technology
Mar 2023 57x38% +25%−1% −17%
HAVELLS
Producer Manufacturing
Oct 2020 62x22% +5%0% +9%
SUMICHEM
Process Industries
Sep 2022 59x33% +25%−4% −28%
UNITDSPR
Consumer Non-Durables
Aug 2024 76x28% +46%0% −4%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
CUMMINSIND
Producer Manufacturing
Mar 2024 68x27% +85%0% −2%
BOSCHLTD
Producer Manufacturing
Jul 2025 59x21% +16%0% −3%
3MINDIA
Producer Manufacturing
Dec 2023 78x31% +70%0% −31%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, P/S and debt/equity. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to LG ELECTRONICS INDIA LTD. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Producer Manufacturing
77%similar
market cappromoter holding
Process Industries
68%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
SIEMENSSIEMENS
Producer Manufacturing
68%similar
market caprevenue
BOSCHBOSCHLTD
Producer Manufacturing
67%similar
market caprevenue
Retail Trade
61%similar
P/Emarket cap
Consumer Durables
70%similar
promoter holdingdebt/equity
Consumer Durables
25%similar
market caprevenue
TTK PRESTIGETTKPRESTIG
Consumer Durables
20%similar
debt/equityoperating margin

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

7 events since Dec '25

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 7.1x its 50-day median on 2026-10-05; price +2.9% that day.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 26.2x its 50-day median on 2026-08-14; price +9.6% that day.
  3. JunPeer rankMoved into the 2nd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the bottom quartile).
  4. JunPriceVolume reached 12.9x its 50-day median on 2026-06-19; price +2.5% that day.
  5. MarPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 3rd quartile).
  6. JanPriceVolume reached 5.7x its 50-day median on 2026-01-08; price -1.8% that day.
  7. DecPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Consumer Durables on operating margin (from the 2nd quartile).

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history14 months · 2025-10 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1166.7x₹25575 cr23.8%32.0%0.1x
2026-1061.8x₹25575 cr23.8%32.0%0.1x
2026-0964.1x₹25575 cr23.8%32.0%0.1x
2026-0868.4x₹24605 cr22.0%32.0%0.1x
2026-0760.0x₹24605 cr22.0%32.0%0.1x
2026-0662.5x₹24605 cr22.0%32.0%0.1x
2026-0559.2x₹23999 cr29.3%57.0%0.1x
2026-0461.9x₹23999 cr29.3%57.0%0.1x
2026-0356.0x₹23999 cr29.3%57.0%0.1x
2026-0257.0x₹24281 cr31.7%57.0%0.1x
2026-0152.5x₹24281 cr31.7%57.0%0.1x
2025-1254.6x₹24281 cr31.7%57.0%0.1x
2025-1151.1x₹24221 cr34.1%57.0%0.1x
2025-1051.3x₹24221 cr34.1%57.0%0.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback