अApnaFunda

REGAAL RESOURCES LIMITED (REGAAL)

Process Industries · Agricultural Commodities/Milling · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.36 / 100
Profitability 61Balance sheet 11
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.61 / 100
Price 78Earnings 45

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹88.64 latest close · +4.7% over the last 90 sessions

₹80₹90₹100Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹80₹90₹100Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹88.64 month-end · +14.1% over 12 months

₹60₹70₹80₹90Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹60₹70₹80₹90Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹88.64 month-end · −22.3% since Aug '25

₹60₹80₹100Aug '25Nov '25Feb '26May '26Aug '26Nov '26 ₹60₹80₹100Aug '25Apr '26Nov '26

52-week range ₹57.27 to ₹103.00 · 1-year volatility 53.8%

Was the rally earned?

+14%share price, 1 yearMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 13.2x to 15.2x); per-share earnings took off 1 point.
  • The share count rose 29%.
Net profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15 ptsP/E changeShare count change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−27 ptsShare count changeShare price: +14%+14%Share priceNet profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26ProfitP/E change: +15 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+15P/EShare count change: −27 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.−27SharesShare price: +14%+14%Share price
Net profit growth+26 ptsNet profit rose about 28%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+15 ptsThe P/E rose from 13.2x to 15.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change-27 ptsShare count rose 29%, which lowers the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 3 years and 5 years: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with PATANJALI FOODS

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-55.4%not yet recovered
1-year volatility53.8%annualised
Volume spikes10last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−20%−40%2026−54.6% 0%−20%−40%2026−54.6%
Largest drawdowns

-55.4% (2025-08 peak to 2026-02 low, not yet recovered)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-09-24: 9.7x the 50-day median, price -4.2% that day

2026-09-23: 25.5x the 50-day median, price -2.7% that day

2026-09-22: 62x the 50-day median, price +16.5% that day

Where does it rank among Process Industries peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Process Industries peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE54th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin68th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth62nd
  • EPS growth35th
  • Debt/equity ↓10th▲ 5 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓79th▲ 22 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓59th▼ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • 12M momentum74th

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Process Industries sector page Watch it move against Process Industries in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~19%annual earnings growth implied by the price

At a P/E of 27.0x, the price would imply about 18.8%/yr earnings growth for 10 years under the same assumptions, but it is not ranked.

Below the ₹1,000 cr market-cap floor used for the lists.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect.

What prices imply across Process Industries The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹88.64
P/E
15.2x
ROCE
12.0%
Market Cap
₹913 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹1090 cr
P/S
0.8x
P/B
1.9x
ROE
12.3%
Operating Margin
15.0%
Debt / Equity
1.3x
Promoter Holding
71.3%
12M Momentum
14.1%

52-week range

₹57.27₹103.00
69% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
53.8%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
1.13

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
3.7x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
0.29x
low
Share count, 1Y
+24.4%

Are profits backed by cash?

2 of 5checks within range3 beyond a threshold
Other income reliance-8%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): -7.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion0.29xBeyond threshold

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 0.29x (cash from operations ₹36 cr, net profit ₹126 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow0 of 5 yrsBeyond threshold

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 0. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Capital work in progress126% of fixed assetsBeyond threshold

Capital work-in-progress is 126% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days—Not enough data

Not enough reported data to compute this.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Since Sep 2025, DIIs trimmed 2.8 pts; FIIs trimmed 1.2 pts; promoters added 0.9 pts.
  • The number of shareholders fell from 68,999 to 54,971 (-20%) between Sep 2025 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupSep '25Jun '26Change
Promoters70.5%71.3%+0.9 pts
FIIs1.5%0.3%-1.2 pts
DIIs5.4%2.6%-2.8 pts
Public and others22.6%25.8%+3.2 pts

Number of shareholders

54,971shareholders-20% since Sep '25
55k60k64k69k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 68,999
Dec '25: 64,844
Mar '26: 59,868
Jun '26: 54,971
55k60k64k69k Sep '25Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26
Sep '25: 68,999
Dec '25: 64,844
Mar '26: 59,868
Jun '26: 54,971

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−4.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like REGAAL RESOURCES LIMITED today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −23% to +41% vs the market, against −4% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−0.4%, 80% range −8.7% to +27.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−100%−50%0%+50%+100%
AVG · Oct 2024: −56.8% vs market
RICOAUTO · Apr 2024: −54.9% vs market
JAYBARMARU · Mar 2024: −53.8% vs market
UGARSUGAR · Mar 2023: −52.2% vs market
AUTOIND · Aug 2024: −49.0% vs market
STLTECH · Jun 2021: −43.9% vs market
INDORAMA · Apr 2022: −41.9% vs market
KESORAMIND · Jun 2021: −40.3% vs market
AIROLAM · Feb 2024: −39.5% vs market
AWHCL · Oct 2024: −34.4% vs market
AVADHSUGAR · Apr 2022: −31.2% vs market
EUROBOND · Sep 2025: −30.3% vs market
SANGAMIND · Jan 2024: −23.5% vs market
RPSGVENT · Aug 2024: −23.0% vs market
INDOAMIN · Jan 2024: −22.5% vs market
PENIND · Feb 2025: −19.1% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Jul 2025: −16.8% vs market
JKTYRE · Nov 2023: −16.5% vs market
MANORG · Sep 2025: −16.2% vs market
DCMSRIND · Nov 2023: −14.2% vs market
GOODLUCK · Nov 2023: −12.6% vs market
RITCO · Jun 2024: −10.3% vs market
TBZ · Dec 2020: −7.2% vs market
MAGADSUGAR · Jun 2021: −5.6% vs market
ARIHANTSUP · Jul 2022: −5.6% vs market
INDSWFTLAB · Aug 2023: −3.9% vs market
DBL · Oct 2024: −3.9% vs market
EDELWEISS · Apr 2024: −1.6% vs market
LUMAXTECH · Jul 2023: +1.7% vs market
INDIANHUME · Feb 2024: +14.2% vs market
RAIN · Aug 2020: +26.9% vs market
PCBL · Jul 2024: +28.6% vs market
PRECOT · Jul 2025: +29.2% vs market
RAMRAT · Aug 2023: +31.3% vs market
SHIVATEX · Feb 2021: +35.3% vs market
TCPLPACK · Jun 2022: +40.0% vs market
HITECH · Feb 2021: +40.9% vs market
FILATEX · Feb 2021: +41.1% vs market
HITECHCORP · Apr 2021: +45.6% vs market
BLKASHYAP · Mar 2023: +48.9% vs market
KIRLOSENG · Oct 2023: +51.4% vs market
ASHAPURMIN · Apr 2023: +58.0% vs market
GOKEX · Oct 2021: +64.1% vs market
LTFOODS · May 2020: +64.2% vs market
REMSONSIND · Sep 2023: +70.6% vs market
GPTINFRA · Oct 2023: +73.0% vs market
GPIL · Dec 2020: +73.1% vs market
VISHNU · May 2020: +78.1% vs market
SALZERELEC · Aug 2023: +82.9% vs market
COMSYN · Mar 2025: +108.4% vs market
Similar setups −4.8%All companies −4.4%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−4.8%
All companies' median
−4.4%
Beat the market
44% vs 45%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 29 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
LTFOODS
Process Industries
May 2020 7x12% −11%−17% +64%
INDORAMA
Process Industries
Apr 2022 18x11% +115%−5% −42%
TCPLPACK
Commercial Services
Jun 2022 16x14% +55%−9% +40%
SHIVATEX
Process Industries
Feb 2021 19x— +70%−6% +35%
PENIND
Non-Energy Minerals
Feb 2025 20x16% +17%−30% −19%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
UGARSUGAR
Process Industries
Mar 2023 20x12% +35%−15% −52%
COSMOFIRST
Process Industries
Jul 2025 20x10% +9%−20% −17%
INDOAMIN
Process Industries
Jan 2024 31x17% +78%0% −23%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: 12-month momentum, ROCE and interest cover. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to REGAAL RESOURCES LIMITED. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Transportation
65%similar
market capdebt/equity
Finance
63%similar
debt/equityvolatility
BIRLA CABLEBIRLACABLE
Producer Manufacturing
62%similar
market capvolatility
Electronic Technology
61%similar
promoter holdingROCE
Non-Energy Minerals
54%similar
P/Emarket cap
PRECOTPRECOT
Process Industries
64%similar
P/Emarket cap
Process Industries
63%similar
debt/equitymarket cap
Process Industries
53%similar
P/EROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

8 events since Dec '25

  1. SepPriceVolume reached 62.0x its 50-day median on 2026-09-22; price +16.5% that day.
  2. AugSharesShare count is up 24.4% over 12 months.
  3. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.8 pts over 2 quarters to 3.1%.
  4. JunDividendStarted paying a dividend (payout 5% of profit).
  5. MayPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2026-05-08; price +9.6% that day.
  6. FebPriceFell 55% from the Aug 2025 peak to the Feb 2026 low.
  7. FebPriceVolume reached 122.0x its 50-day median on 2026-02-24; price +7.5% that day.
  8. DecPriceVolume reached 5.6x its 50-day median on 2025-12-31; price +3.1% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history16 months · 2025-08 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-1115.2x₹1090 cr12.3%12.0%1.3x
2026-1014.8x₹1090 cr12.3%12.0%1.3x
2026-0915.1x₹1090 cr12.3%12.0%1.3x
2026-0815.8x₹1135 cr11.5%12.0%1.3x
2026-0714.5x₹1135 cr11.5%12.0%1.3x
2026-0613.9x₹1135 cr11.5%12.0%1.3x
2026-0516.0x₹1149 cr20.6%16.0%2.1x
2026-0415.4x₹1149 cr20.6%16.0%2.1x
2026-0311.4x₹1149 cr20.6%16.0%2.1x
2026-0212.5x₹1083 cr21.0%16.0%2.1x
2026-0110.4x₹1083 cr21.0%16.0%2.1x
2025-1212.1x₹1083 cr21.0%16.0%2.1x
2025-1113.2x₹968 cr19.3%16.0%2.1x
2025-1015.4x₹968 cr19.3%16.0%2.1x
2025-0915.0x₹968 cr19.3%16.0%2.1x
2025-0819.0x₹916 cr19.3%16.0%2.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback