अApnaFunda

CHENNAI PETROLEUM CORPORATION (CHENNPETRO)

Energy Minerals · Oil Refining/Marketing · figures to Nov '26

Quality scoreHow the business itself ranks against its sector peers on profitability, 3-year growth and leverage. 50 is the middle of the sector.59 / 100
Profitability 65Growth 31Balance sheet 81
Momentum scoreHow strong the recent trend is: 3-month price change, 12-month improvement in earnings and the rise in FII + DII holding, among companies above ₹500 cr.93 / 100
Price 89Earnings 93FII/DII 96

Passes these screensCash RichQuality CompounderValue PickHigh MomentumDebt-light & profitableLittle growth priced in

Share price

Closing priceAdjusted for splits and bonus issues.

₹1,460.9 latest close · +35.4% over the last 90 sessions

₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Jul 29Aug 24Sep 17Oct 14Nov 9 ₹1,000₹1,200₹1,400₹1,600Jul 3Sep 4Nov 9

₹1,460.9 month-end · +66.4% over 12 months

₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Nov '25Jan '26Apr '26Jun '26Sep '26Nov '26 ₹750₹1,000₹1,250₹1,500Nov '25May '26Nov '26

₹1,460.9 month-end · +129.1% over 3 years

₹500₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23Jun '24Jan '25Sep '25Apr '26Nov '26 ₹500₹1,000₹1,500Nov '23May '25Nov '26

₹1,460.9 month-end · +529.7% since Jan '19

₹0₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jan '19Aug '20Mar '22Sep '23Apr '25Nov '26 ₹0₹500₹1,000₹1,500Jan '19Dec '22Nov '26

52-week range ₹733.50 to ₹1677.50 · 1-year volatility 52.5%

Was the rally earned?

+129%share price, 3 yearsMultiple-driven

Partly.

  • Most of the rise came from investors paying a higher multiple (P/E 2.7x to 5.2x); per-share earnings added 26 points.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: +103 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+103 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +129%+129%Share priceNet profit growth: +26 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+26ProfitP/E change: +103 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.+103P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +129%+129%Share price
Net profit growth+26 ptsNet profit rose about 18%, which lifts the price.
P/E change+103 ptsThe P/E rose from 2.7x to 5.2x, which lifts the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
+1358%share price, 5 yearsLower P/E held it back

Mostly yes, with a catch.

  • Per-share earnings added 1412 points, but investors now pay less per rupee of profit (P/E 5.8x to 5.2x), which took 54 points back.
  • The share count barely moved.
Net profit growth: +1413 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1413 ptsNet profit growthP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54 ptsP/E changeShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0 ptsShare count changeShare price: +1358%+1358%Share priceNet profit growth: +1413 pts. Points of the price return explained by net profit growing (or shrinking).+1413ProfitP/E change: −54 pts. Points of the price return explained by the market paying a higher or lower P/E multiple.−54P/EShare count change: 0 pts. Points of the price return explained by the share count changing. More shares count against the price.0SharesShare price: +1358%+1358%Share price
Net profit growth+1413 ptsNet profit rose about 1524%, which lifts the price.
P/E change-54 ptsThe P/E fell from 5.8x to 5.2x, which lowers the price.
Share count change0 ptsShare count was little changed. More shares would count against the price.
What do "pts" mean?

"pts" are percentage points of the share price return. The parts add up to the total shown for each period. Because price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count, higher profit pushes the price up, a higher P/E pushes it up, and more shares push it down.

Example: if the price rose 34% and profit growth accounts for +58 pts while a lower P/E accounts for -24 pts, then 58 - 24 = 34. The +58 is not the profit growth rate itself: it is the part of the price move that profit growth explains.

Not shown for 1 year: earnings were negative at one end, or there is not enough history.

Net profit is trailing twelve months as reported with a 60-day lag.

Compare this with RELIANCE INDUSTRIES

How rough has the ride been?

Maximum drawdown-83.5%recovered 2022-05
1-year volatility52.5%annualised
Beta vs sector index1.013-year daily, correlation 0.39
Volume spikes5last 90 sessions, 5x the 50-day median

Drawdown from peak

0%−25%−50%−75%2020202120222023202420252026−82.9% 0%−25%−50%−75%2020202220242026−82.9%
Largest drawdowns

-83.5% (2019-01 peak to 2020-05 low, recovered 2022-05)

-63.0% (2024-07 peak to 2025-02 low, recovered 2026-06)

-50.2% (2022-06 peak to 2022-12 low, recovered 2023-05)

Most recent volume spikes

2026-10-07: 12.5x the 50-day median, price +14.7% that day

2026-09-09: 5.5x the 50-day median, price +10.1% that day

2026-08-11: 13.9x the 50-day median, price +15.0% that day

Beta is the slope of daily returns against a market-cap-weighted index of the sector's other listed companies, built from today's constituents (so it excludes companies no longer listed).

Is it expensive against its own past and its peers?

5.2xP/E todayWithin its usual range
Against its own history53rd percentile
CheapestMedian 5.2xDearest

Usual range 2.3x to 15.5x since 2019-01.

Against Energy Minerals5.2x vs 12.7x
This company
5.2x
Sector median
12.7x

59% below the Energy Minerals median.

1.6x16.2x30.8x45.5xJan '19Aug '20Mar '22Oct '23May '25Nov '261.6x16.2x30.8x45.5xJan '19Sep '21May '24Nov '26
P/E (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/B (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median

The chart loads when you open this tab.

P/S (this company)10th to 90th percentile of its own historyIts medianEnergy Minerals median
How to read this

Shaded band: 10th to 90th percentile of the company's own P/E history; dotted line: its median; orange line: sector median (companies with a positive multiple, at least 5 in the sector).

Sector figures are built from today's listed companies, so they exclude companies that are no longer listed.

All terms explained in the glossary →

How Energy Minerals is valued

Where does it rank among Energy Minerals peers?

Each cell is the company's percentile rank among its Energy Minerals peers (non-financial companies) that month.
Darker is better-ranked.
Rows marked ↓ are inverted (lower debt, shorter cash cycle and a lower P/E rank higher).

Where it ranks today

  • ROCE98th▲ 87 pts vs a year ago
  • Op. margin32nd▲ 27 pts vs a year ago
  • Revenue growth75th▲ 60 pts vs a year ago
  • EPS growth95th▲ 80 pts vs a year ago
  • Debt/equity ↓64th▲ 18 pts vs a year ago
  • Cash cycle ↓77th▲ 16 pts vs a year ago
  • P/E ↓100th
  • 12M momentum92ndflat vs a year ago

Rank history

ROCE
Op. margin
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Debt/equity ↓
Cash cycle ↓
P/E ↓
12M momentum
Dec '21Jul '22Jan '23Jul '23Jan '24Jul '24Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26Nov '26
Lower rank Higher rank Not enough data

Percentiles use today's listed companies in the sector and need at least 5 peers with a value; grey cells have too few.
ROE is computed from net profit and book value where the source does not report it.

The Energy Minerals sector page Watch it move against Energy Minerals in the Observatory

What is the price implying?

~5%annual earnings growth implied by the priceBelow delivered growth

At normalised P/E (five-year average earnings) of 9.9x, a holder earning 12%/yr needs earnings to grow about 4.9%/yr for 10 years, then trade at 15x.

Delivered19.2%/yrEPS, last 10 fiscal years · 3-yr avg to 3-yr avg
Gap−14.3 ptsimplied minus delivered
Rank747thmost demanding of 856

Over time

Implied growth by month (solid) and delivered growth (dashed).

-3%16%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026 -3%16%35% Jan 2019Nov 2026

Change the assumptions

Exit P/E / return11%12%13%
12x6.0%7.0%7.9%
15x4.0%4.9%5.9%
20x1.4%2.3%3.2%

Drag a slider to test other assumptions

Implied: 4.9%/yr

Looking back

  • Jan 2022Price implied 2%/yr; EPS has since grown 65%/yr (5.0 yrs)

Past comparisons cover only companies listed today (survivorship bias) and say nothing about future outcomes.

“Implied growth” is what the current price would require under our stated assumptions, not what we expect. How this is calculated and the market-wide lists.

What prices imply across Energy Minerals The market-wide Expectations lists

Key figures

Share Priceclose 9 Nov
₹1460.90
P/E
5.2x
ROCE
35.0%
Market Cap
₹21747 cr
Revenue (TTM)
₹76196 cr
P/S
0.3x
P/B
2.0x
ROE
37.6%
Operating Margin
6.0%
Debt / Equity
0.2x
Promoter Holding
67.3%
12M Momentum
66.4%

52-week range

₹733.50₹1677.50
77% of the way from its 52-week low to its high

Price risk

1Y volatility
52.5%
Beta vs sector
1-year daily
0.70

Balance sheet & cash

Interest cover
operating profit ÷ interest
42.5x
Cash from profit, 3Y
operating cash flow ÷ net profit
1.15x
Share count, 1Y
unchanged

Are profits backed by cash?

7 of 7checks within rangeAll clear
Other income reliance3%Within range

Other income as a share of pre-tax profit (trailing twelve months): 2.5%. Bands: below 15%, 15% to 35%, above 35%.

Tax rate25%Within range

Median quarterly effective tax rate over about 2.5 years: 25.0%. Bands: 15% to 35%, 5% to 15% or 35% to 50%, outside 5% to 50%.

Cash conversion1.15xWithin range

Operating cash flow divided by net profit over the last three fiscal years: 1.15x (cash from operations ₹6,991 cr, net profit ₹6,062 cr). Bands: 0.8x and above, 0.5x to 0.8x, below 0.5x.

Free cash flow5 of 5 yrsWithin range

Fiscal years with positive free cash flow in the last 5: 5. Bands: at least 80% of years, 40% to 80%, below 40%.

Receivable days vs history0 daysWithin range

Debtor days are below the median of the previous three fiscal years by 0 days (1 vs 1). Bands: under 15 days, 15 to 45, over 45.

Capital work in progress5% of fixed assetsWithin range

Capital work-in-progress is 5% of fixed assets. Bands: not rising or up to 30%; rising for three years and above 30%; rising and above 60%.

Payable days-1 days / 2 yrsWithin range

Days payable changed by -1 over two years. Bands: rise of up to 30 days; more than 30 days.

Tap a check to see how it is measured

How to read this

Each check is a named rule with fixed thresholds, not a score. Annual statements are the latest restated figures, so a past year may differ from what was originally reported.

All terms explained in the glossary →

Who has been buying and selling?

  • Over 2 years, institutional and promoter holdings were broadly unchanged.
  • The number of shareholders rose from 99,496 to 1.5 lakh (+50%) between Dec 2023 and Jun 2026.

Holdings, Jun '26

How each group changed

GroupDec '23Jun '26Change
Promoters67.3%67.3%0.0 pts
FIIs14.7%15.0%+0.3 pts
DIIs1.2%1.0%-0.2 pts
Public and others16.8%16.7%-0.1 pts

Number of shareholders

1.5 lakhshareholders+50% since Dec '23
99k1.4L1.7L2.1L Dec '23Jun '24Dec '24Jun '25Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 99,496
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.2 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.9 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.0 lakh
Sep '25: 1.8 lakh
Dec '25: 1.6 lakh
Mar '26: 1.5 lakh
Jun '26: 1.5 lakh
99k1.4L1.7L2.1L Dec '23Dec '24Dec '25Jun '26
Dec '23: 99,496
Mar '24: 1.1 lakh
Jun '24: 1.2 lakh
Sep '24: 1.4 lakh
Dec '24: 1.9 lakh
Mar '25: 2.1 lakh
Jun '25: 2.0 lakh
Sep '25: 1.8 lakh
Dec '25: 1.6 lakh
Mar '26: 1.5 lakh
Jun '26: 1.5 lakh

Quarterly shareholding as reported, labelled by the quarter it covers (it becomes visible about two months later).
Shareholder counts are only available for recent quarters.

This quarter's smart-money board

What happened next to similar setups

−11.8%typical 12-month return vs the marketNot meaningfully different from the base rate
  • We found 50 past situations where a non-financial company looked like CHENNAI PETROLEUM CORPORATION today on valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, price momentum, size and volatility.
  • Over the following 12 months the middle half of them returned −29% to +40% vs the market, against −2% for all non-financial companies in the same months.
  • The gap against the base rate (−10.0%, 80% range −18.6% to +3.4%) is within what chance and overlapping periods produce.

Where the 50 outcomes landed

−50%0%+50%+100%
RPPINFRA · Nov 2024: −49.6% vs market
JINDALPOLY · Feb 2022: −41.4% vs market
COSMOFIRST · Jun 2022: −40.5% vs market
WSTCSTPAPR · Sep 2023: −39.8% vs market
ELECTHERM · Apr 2025: −37.7% vs market
NRAIL · Jun 2020: −36.9% vs market
INDORAMA · Jun 2022: −34.6% vs market
TIRUMALCHM · Jun 2022: −32.2% vs market
EIDPARRY · Oct 2022: −32.1% vs market
MANAKSIA · Feb 2023: −31.4% vs market
PANAMAPET · Nov 2022: −30.7% vs market
GSPL · Apr 2023: −29.6% vs market
GNFC · Jul 2022: −29.5% vs market
HINDPETRO · Mar 2020: −28.8% vs market
MAITHANALL · Oct 2025: −26.0% vs market
SHREYANIND · Sep 2023: −25.6% vs market
BBTC · Jan 2025: −23.5% vs market
GTPL · Jun 2021: −20.8% vs market
TNPETRO · Jun 2021: −19.9% vs market
VEDL · Nov 2021: −18.4% vs market
TATASTEEL · Jan 2023: −18.0% vs market
PRAKASH · Mar 2021: −17.1% vs market
IGPL · Jul 2021: −15.6% vs market
JINDALSAW · Jun 2024: −13.3% vs market
DBCORP · Jun 2024: −12.0% vs market
ALLCARGO · Jul 2022: −11.6% vs market
CLSEL · Sep 2023: −11.1% vs market
GULFOILLUB · Sep 2024: −3.2% vs market
OIL · Apr 2024: −2.2% vs market
PDMJEPAPER · Jun 2024: +2.9% vs market
SRHHYPOLTD · Jun 2021: +17.2% vs market
MANALIPETC · Jun 2021: +17.4% vs market
DLINKINDIA · Aug 2023: +22.4% vs market
MADRASFERT · Sep 2022: +24.9% vs market
GPIL · Jan 2023: +37.1% vs market
WELCORP · May 2021: +37.5% vs market
GOKULAGRO · Jun 2025: +38.7% vs market
LGBBROSLTD · Aug 2022: +40.3% vs market
REDINGTON · Sep 2025: +45.9% vs market
FILATEX · Oct 2025: +48.8% vs market
NMDC · Oct 2022: +53.2% vs market
BANCOINDIA · Jun 2023: +55.7% vs market
POLYPLEX · Jun 2021: +58.7% vs market
GAEL · Jun 2021: +62.8% vs market
BCG · Aug 2021: +63.5% vs market
SARDAEN · Jan 2023: +64.4% vs market
HGS · Jan 2021: +69.4% vs market
JSL · Apr 2023: +69.7% vs market
LTFOODS · Jun 2024: +85.9% vs market
IRCON · Jun 2023: +120.4% vs market
Similar setups −11.8%All companies −1.8%← worse than the marketbetter than the market →

Each dot is one past situation (hover or tap for details) · Solid dots are the closest matches, listed below · Shaded is the middle half of all companies in the same months · 1 beyond the range shown, drawn at the edge

Similar setups' median
−11.8%
All companies' median
−1.8%
Beat the market
42% vs 48%

50 past situations · 50 companies · 31 months · 2020–2025

The closest matches

CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
ELECTHERM
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2025 4x40% +52%−15% −38%
JSL
Non-Energy Minerals
Apr 2023 5x44% +54%−11% +70%
REDINGTON
Distribution Services
Sep 2025 13x19% +54%−14% +46%
GPIL
Non-Energy Minerals
Jan 2023 4x54% +33%−17% +37%
JINDALPOLY
Process Industries
Feb 2022 6x32% +107%−23% −41%
Show the other 3 matches
CompanyWhenP/EROCE12M mom.DrawdownNext 12 months
WELCORP
Producer Manufacturing
May 2021 6x30% +154%−2% +38%
CLSEL
Process Industries
Sep 2023 10x26% +120%−3% −11%
NMDC
Non-Energy Minerals
Oct 2022 3x50% +62%−4% +53%
How reliable is this?

Matched on P/E, P/S, ROCE, operating margin, debt/equity, interest cover, revenue growth, 12-month momentum, drawdown from 12-month high, size and volatility. Closest on: drawdown from 12-month high, revenue growth and debt/equity. One match per company and at most 7 from any one month.

Independent periods: the matches fall in 6 distinct 12-month windows. Matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, so fewer windows means less evidence.

How this is built

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to CHENNAI PETROLEUM CORPORATION. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

Methodology

How historical analogs are built

Data as of 2026-11-09. Outcome pool: Jan 2020 to Oct 2025.

For every company we look at the situation it is in today (valuation, return on capital, margins, debt, growth, 12-month price momentum, drawdown, size and volatility) and find past company-months that looked most like it. We then show what happened to those past situations over the following 12 months, measured against the ApnaFunda All index and against the base rate. It describes history. It does not predict anything.

What is compared

FeatureWeightNon-financialFinancial
P/E1yesyes
P/S1yes—
P/B1—yes
ROCE1yes—
operating margin1yes—
ROE1—yes
debt/equity0.75yes—
interest cover0.5yes—
revenue growth0.75yesyes
12-month momentum1yesyes
drawdown from 12-month high0.75yesyes
size0.75yesyes
volatility0.5yesyes

Weights were set by judgement before any outcome was looked at and are never tuned on results. Loss-making companies (negative P/E or net profit) are only matched with other loss-making companies. Banks, NBFCs and insurers are compared only with each other and use a different feature set. Every feature is converted, month by month, to its rank among companies in the same pool in that month, so a P/E of 30 in a hot market and a P/E of 22 in a cold one can match if both were equally expensive for their time. Only that month's data is used.

How closeness and the sample are defined

Distance is the weighted root-mean-square gap between the standardised features both companies have. A match needs at least 70% of the query's feature weight, a distance of at most 0.9, and 30 matches at minimum to be shown. We keep up to 50 matches with these exclusions: never the company itself, one match per company (its closest month), and at most 7 from any one calendar month so a single market episode cannot dominate.

Base rate

The base rate is the distribution of 12-month returns, relative to the market, of every eligible company-month in the same pool, with each month weighted to match the months the analogs came from. It answers: how did a random company do in these same months? Because matches from nearby months share the same market conditions, we also report the number of distinct 12-month windows behind a result, and a bootstrap that resamples months decides whether the analog median differs from the base rate at all. "Not meaningfully different" is the usual outcome and the page copy is written for it.

Limits you should know

  • One market period. The outcome pool covers 2020–2025 only (70 months), including the 2020 crash and the 2020–21 rally.
  • Survivorship. Only companies listed today are included. Delisted and bankrupt companies are missing, which flatters past outcomes, particularly for distressed-looking setups.
  • Price return only. Dividends are excluded, and the benchmark is an ApnaFunda market-cap-weighted index of the same listed companies, not an official index.
  • Reporting lag. Fundamentals are matched on an assumed 60-day lag after the quarter end, not on real announcement dates.
  • Pools: non-financial: 98,395 company-months from 2019 companies; financial: 5,659 company-months from 108 companies. 2349 companies currently have a result; the rest are suppressed because too few comparable situations exist.

Does it work? A walk-forward check

The walk-forward check has not been run for this build, so skill is shown as not yet measured.

Disclaimer

This is history, not a forecast. These are past situations where other companies had broadly similar reported numbers and price trends. What happened to them does not tell you what will happen to any company shown. The comparison covers only 2020–2025, a single market period, and only companies still listed today. Companies that were delisted or went bankrupt are missing, which makes past outcomes look better than they were. Returns exclude dividends and are measured against an ApnaFunda-built index, not an official benchmark. Fundamentals are matched on a 60-day assumed reporting lag, not actual announcement dates. Its historical skill has not yet been measured. Past patterns may not repeat.

What else looks like this?

Companies with the most similar financial profile today, regardless of industry.

Non-Energy Minerals
60%similar
EPS growthoperating margin
VIKRAM SOLARVIKRAMSOLR
Process Industries
53%similar
debt/equityROCE
Commercial Services
48%similar
revenue growthEPS growth
Producer Manufacturing
44%similar
ROCEpromoter holding
SURYA ROSHNISURYAROSNI
Non-Energy Minerals
43%similar
revenue growthoperating margin
Energy Minerals
51%similar
EPS growthrevenue
Energy Minerals
28%similar
volatilitydebt/equity
Energy Minerals
23%similar
promoter holdingROCE

Similarity is statistical, based on reported metrics; it does not imply similar business quality or future returns.

What changed?

30 events since Oct '23

  1. OctPriceVolume reached 12.5x its 50-day median on 2026-10-07; price +14.7% that day.
  2. AugPriceVolume reached 13.9x its 50-day median on 2026-08-11; price +15.0% that day.
  3. JunPriceRegained the 2024-07 peak, 16 months after the low.
  4. JunInstitutionsFII + DII holding rose 3.3 pts over 2 quarters to 14.7%.
  5. JunPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the bottom quartile).
  6. JunDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.18x.
  7. MarPriceVolume reached 9.6x its 50-day median on 2026-03-17; price +7.7% that day.
  8. JanResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned positive.
Show 22 earlier events
  1. DecResultsEPS (TTM) turned positive.
  2. DecPeer rankMoved into the top quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the bottom quartile).
  3. OctPriceVolume reached 41.0x its 50-day median on 2025-10-31; price +10.7% that day.
  4. SepResultsEPS (TTM) turned negative.
  5. JulPriceVolume reached 17.8x its 50-day median on 2025-07-04; price +8.2% that day.
  6. JunPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Energy Minerals on ROCE (from the top quartile).
  7. JunPriceVolume reached 17.5x its 50-day median on 2025-06-23; price +11.0% that day.
  8. AprDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.32x.
  9. MarInstitutionsFII + DII holding fell 3.7 pts over 2 quarters to 12.9%.
  10. MarPriceVolume reached 36.7x its 50-day median on 2025-03-11; price +7.5% that day.
  11. FebPriceFell 63% from the Jul 2024 peak to the Feb 2025 low.
  12. DecValuationP/E crossed above the 90th percentile of its own history to date (12.5x).
  13. OctPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2024-10-17; price +1.6% that day.
  14. SepPeer rankSlipped to the bottom quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the 3rd quartile).
  15. SepDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.32x.
  16. JulPriceVolume reached 28.2x its 50-day median on 2024-07-16; price +11.7% that day.
  17. JunResultsYear-on-year EPS growth turned negative.
  18. JunPeer rankSlipped to the 3rd quartile of Energy Minerals on EPS growth (from the top quartile).
  19. AprPriceVolume reached 17.6x its 50-day median on 2024-04-24; price +15.8% that day.
  20. FebDebtDebt / equity halved over 12 months to 0.66x.
  21. JanPriceVolume reached 8.5x its 50-day median on 2024-01-11; price +16.2% that day.
  22. OctPriceVolume reached 11.1x its 50-day median on 2023-10-17; price +10.7% that day.

Events are generated from the data by fixed rules.
The month shown is when the change became visible in the reported figures, assuming a 60-day lag after each quarter end; it is not an announcement date.

Where price and fundamentals disagree, market-wide Rewind the whole market to any month

Monthly history95 months · 2019-01 to 2026-11
MonthP/ERevenue (TTM)ROEROCEDebt / Equity
2026-115.2x₹76196 cr37.6%35.0%0.2x
2026-105.4x₹76196 cr37.6%35.0%0.2x
2026-095.1x₹76196 cr37.6%35.0%0.2x
2026-086.6x₹63639 cr27.9%35.0%0.2x
2026-075.8x₹63639 cr27.9%35.0%0.2x
2026-065.3x₹63639 cr27.9%35.0%0.2x
2026-057.0x₹64071 cr26.2%4.0%0.4x
2026-047.5x₹64071 cr26.2%4.0%0.4x
2026-036.4x₹64071 cr26.2%4.0%0.4x
2026-0211.7x₹61313 cr14.3%4.0%0.4x
2026-0110.6x₹61313 cr14.3%4.0%0.4x
2025-1210.2x₹61313 cr14.3%4.0%0.4x
2025-11—₹57072 cr-2.2%4.0%0.4x
2025-10—₹57072 cr-2.2%4.0%0.4x
2025-09—₹57072 cr-2.2%4.0%0.4x
2025-0843.0x₹59355 cr2.6%4.0%0.4x
2025-0745.5x₹59355 cr2.6%4.0%0.4x
2025-0645.2x₹59355 cr2.6%4.0%0.4x
2025-0525.9x₹59826 cr4.2%35.0%0.3x
2025-0423.5x₹59826 cr4.2%35.0%0.3x
2025-0323.6x₹59826 cr4.2%35.0%0.3x
2025-029.0x₹64277 cr8.1%35.0%0.3x
2025-0110.8x₹64277 cr8.1%35.0%0.3x
2024-1212.5x₹64277 cr8.1%35.0%0.3x
2024-113.5x₹68736 cr28.9%35.0%0.3x
2024-103.6x₹68736 cr28.9%35.0%0.3x
2024-095.2x₹68736 cr28.9%35.0%0.3x
2024-085.1x₹66024 cr31.1%35.0%0.3x
2024-075.2x₹66024 cr31.1%35.0%0.3x
2024-065.1x₹66024 cr31.1%35.0%0.3x
2024-053.7x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2024-044.1x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2024-033.7x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2024-023.6x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2024-013.5x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-122.8x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-112.7x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-102.3x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-092.1x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-081.7x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-071.6x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-061.6x₹76271 cr54.5%45.0%0.7x
2023-054.0x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2023-043.2x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2023-032.5x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2023-022.4x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2023-012.6x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-122.2x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-112.3x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-102.2x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-092.5x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-083.1x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-072.9x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-063.3x₹43068 cr45.3%20.0%3.1x
2022-0515.6x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2022-0415.5x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2022-037.1x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2022-025.6x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2022-016.1x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-125.7x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-115.8x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-106.8x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-096.8x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-086.0x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-076.3x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-068.1x₹22222 cr16.0%16.0%5.7x
2021-05—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2021-04—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2021-03—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2021-02—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2021-01—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-12—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-11—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-10—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-09—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-08—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-07—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-06—₹36973 cr-151.3%-26.0%6.4x
2020-05—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2020-04—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2020-03—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2020-02—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2020-01—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-12—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-11—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-10—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-09—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-08—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-07—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-06—₹41113 cr-5.9%1.0%1.9x
2019-053.4x₹32370 cr23.2%21.0%1.1x
2019-043.9x₹32370 cr23.2%21.0%1.1x
2019-034.2x₹32370 cr23.2%21.0%1.1x
2019-023.5x₹32370 cr23.2%21.0%1.1x
2019-013.7x₹32370 cr23.2%21.0%1.1x

Methodology and data notes

Methodology

Methodology and data notes

All figures come from public exchange prices and screener.in financial statements. Quarterly and annual results are shown from 60 days after the period end, so a month never uses a result before it would plausibly have been published. Statements are the latest versions, which may include later restatements.

Sector medians, percentiles and indices use today's listed companies in the sector (survivorship bias). Prices are adjusted for splits and bonus issues; around a corporate action the fundamentals may lag the price by up to a month, and affected sections are hidden.

The return decomposition uses price = P/E × net profit ÷ share count. The reverse DCF uses a fixed 12% cost of equity, a 10-year horizon and a 15x terminal P/E, and is an illustration only. Events, flags and twins follow fixed rules and thresholds described next to each section.

Feedback